Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 20
  1. #1
    for the price of going NA with a Honda.. is it worth the extra money u gonna be spending to get results.. is it worth it over just going Turbo and getting the results cheaper. ?

  2. #2

  3. #3
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Melb
    Car:
    Civic VTi-R Hatch
    its a personal choice. Id rather a worked NA honda any day of the week....
    _________________________________________
    FOR SALE:
    '98 EK CIVIC VTi-R
    ______________________________________________

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by soloisbetter
    for the price of going NA with a Honda.. is it worth the extra money u gonna be spending to get results.. is it worth it over just going Turbo and getting the results cheaper. ?
    Sounds like you have already made up your mind. If you want outright power, nothing beats turbo on the street. IMO, N/A is more about achieving a balance between power and handling.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by VTEC16
    its a personal choice. Id rather a worked NA honda any day of the week....
    WERD!

    Hope this doesn't turn into another thread like that one in lounge forum.

  6. #6

  7. #7
    naa i aint made my mind up just curious.. but how does going N/A give u a balance of Power and Handling .. ur syaing turbo cars cant handle.. im a but lost about how this makes a car handle better or worse..

  8. #8
    read the turbo civic thread in the lounge lol
    フジタエンジニアリング

  9. #9
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Car:
    S15
    solo, from the way you speak you are now defending turbo cars. you have made your mind up dude.

  10. #10
    im just very curious of how u get more balance from a N/A car..

  11. #11
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    CL9|NA6CE
    Quote Originally Posted by soloisbetter
    im just very curious of how u get more balance from a N/A car..
    Should watch some Inital D (yes, I'm serious) and some Best Motoring Internation DVD's.

    Trubo cars get most of their power when turbo spools, which is roughly near mid bands. But for a N/A car, power is pretty much there from the word go, and with Honda's, the added bonus is VTEC. Power curve is also quite linear, and there's no sudden rise in power.

    So what does all this mean?? Take a turbo car and a N/A car on a track and you'll notice that although a N/A car may be slower on the straight, they can corner much faster because power band is linear, even at low revs (cornering). Turbo cars are superiour on the straight, but when u get to a corner, they have to slow down. Slowing down equal less power (turbo not spooling as fast) and when turbo is not spooling, is pretty much N/A vs. N/A.

    So the balance refers to power being distributed evenly at all RPM range, as well as being able to corner as fast as going straight. That's why you see a lot cars such as the AE86, Type-R's, NSX, S2K being crowned as track kings. If u watch BMI, you can actually see an AE86 whip a R34 GT-R on some twisty roads, and S2K's keeping up with S14/15's (both 2L, but N/A vs. turbo).


  12. #12
    Isn't keeping a car in its powerband driver skill?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.