Civic Type S

[Malenic1981]

Here it comes


1.8l 103KW and 2.2 diesel 103KW, nothing special but looks ok.

For more info go to http://world.honda.com/news/2006/406...peS/index.html

[Felix]

A bit under powered me thinks....
Considering a EK VTIR has more power and probably weighs less too.

Also it looks abit crap.

[EK4R]

civic type S ??? wat happen to the 140kw type R ?

[Kandy]

looks like a big bubble!!
and the article says the type s is the foundation for the type r, or something like that i just skimmed it quickly.

[NeoNode]

FFS at least have a K20A donk in it.

[Waggy]

Hmmmm - not bad but I guess this raises a question for me. Will Honda Australia just import this one now instead of the R?

[EK4R]

i read in the Wheels magazine this month it said they lookin to import the civic type R?? then whats this with the type S...cbb reading the article

[bigjo5]

thats a ***n ugly car man..

[yourfather]

wow, with 100kw of power, they'll be able to keep up with base model corollas

[panda[cRx]]

civic type S ??? wat happen to the 140kw type R ?

or the 2.2L civic RR that was rumoured a few months back

[civicCXI]

I read on Hot4s about the concept of civic SI, it looks and performs way better than this

[yfin]

I saw this UK built civic at an airport lounge in Europe somewhere. I couldn't help but notice that it has very irregular panel gaps which makes me wonder about build quality. I should have taken photos to show you guys - but the bonnet was completely out of alignment and the rear quarter panel gaps leading to the boot were different right to left. Yes, it is built to a price - but the early 90s Japan built Honda Civic in my family was built very tight and consistent in terms of panels.

(hey in case anyone is wondering why I was thinking about panel gaps - I had heaps of time to wait for my plane and spent like 20 minutes looking over this civic!)