Page 3 of 11 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 25 to 36 of 123
  1. #25
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NSW
    Car:
    EG6ish
    told u that car was a nugget
    Ctrl + W



  2. #26
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    ED Civic & 380GT
    ^^ I am sure it is a cracker of a car. I am just not so sure it deserves the Type R badge when a previous generation from the late 1990s can outrun it in a straight line. The Type R in the late 90s was in the 140kw range. In 2007 Honda needs to be way ahead of that to compensate for the weight. And then to advertise it as essentially faster than the DC2R? Well that is something...
    Last edited by yfin; 25-07-2007 at 10:58 PM.

  3. #27
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    sydney
    Car:
    Fn2 type r
    it is a true type r! the ride gives you headache!

  4. #28
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Brisbane
    Car:
    2005 VBP DC5 TypeS
    Quote Originally Posted by sitta View Post
    it is a true type r! the ride gives you headache!
    er...you bought the car because it gives you a headache when you drive it

    very interesting article, so the cat is finally out of the bag...
    now we just need people to track their cars and see what they get.

  5. #29
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Geelong,Vic.
    Car:
    2011 FPV F6
    I've just bought the Wheels Mag.Just quoting the 0-400m time of 15.5,for quite a heavy car I still think that it did quite well.
    I wonder if they used 98 octane?
    I'm sure that with 98 petrol and a couple of thousand klms,the CTR should shave a couple of tenths or so of the time.

  6. #30
    Ninja turtle Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Chloe
    Quote Originally Posted by yfin View Post
    ^^ I am sure it is a cracker of a car. I am just not so sure it deserves the Type R badge when a previous generation from the late 1990s can outrun it in a straight line. The Type R in the late 90s was in the 140kw range. In 2007 Honda needs to be way ahead of that to compensate for the weight. And then to advertise it as essentially faster than the DC2R? Well that is something...
    It's a hot hatch. Honda Japan didn't think it was a track car, so they made the FD2 CTR rather than take the UK CTR like they did previously with the EP3.
    --------------------------------------
    Stocky CL9 - 1:17.2

  7. #31
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Cremorne, Sydney
    Car:
    Js Racing Time Attack DC5
    We have to look at it's main competitors. It's been brought out here to combat the GTI, MPS3 and XR5. All three of these cars have been doing really well where as the WRX has steadily been losing sales over the past 3 years.

    If I was at Honda Australia I'd choose to bring out the UK CTR too. Less and less people want bonejarring raw rides and want more safety and features.

  8. #32
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    BMW Showroom
    Car:
    BMW
    well said monty

    that is exactly right! its not like the old true type Rs, but nobody ever asks for cars like that anymore.
    Most people want the safety and luxury features! THats just the way that market has gone!
    If u want a raw car like that get a lotus lol
    im not biased, i just tell it how it is.

  9. #33
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    2001 DC2R
    No way is it doing 6.6 with 110kw/tonnes vs the DC2R's almost 130kw/tonnes
    My order's simple... a sh*#load of dim sims and a bucket of soya sauce.
    Low cost mod: Filled my car with helium balloons. Power to weight biaaaaatch!

  10. #34
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    [Melb]
    Car:
    Not a Honda
    Quote Originally Posted by yfin View Post
    Quotes:

    "It feels fast, sounds fast and... erm... isn't that fast".
    I like that.... It looks fast too with all the typeR stickers and spaceship interior

  11. #35
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    [Melb]
    Car:
    Not a Honda
    Quote Originally Posted by UNLS1 View Post
    well said monty

    that is exactly right! its not like the old true type Rs, but nobody ever asks for cars like that anymore.
    Most people want the safety and luxury features! THats just the way that market has gone!
    If u want a raw car like that get a lotus lol
    This is named a Type R which suppoed to be raw. If you want safety and luxury features, get a Benz or BM.

  12. #36
    Drive a new CTR with earplugs and sunglasses on and aim in a straight line. It will feel like a accord euro

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.