Perhaps I'll have to take a spin in a Type S one day. Considering the DC2 Type R doesn't come on aggressively either though, I doubt any DC5 will. Never driven one though, so I could be wrong.
u gotta be dreaming.. haha they wudnt make newer engines if they werent better, if they did then wats the point of making new things?
so i come to my rest saying that get in a type s and ull see whats up well or type r ;P ok
u gotta be dreaming.. haha they wudnt make newer engines if they werent better, if they did then wats the point of making new things?
so i come to my rest saying that get in a type s and ull see whats up well or type r ;P ok
There are many types of 'better'. Considering the trend towards smoother more economical engines with lower emissions these days, I doubt a Type S engine would be more aggressive than a B18C engine. It should be softer, more gentle. Some evidence to the fact is that the DC5 Type R engine (JDM 162kw) isn't much more powerful than the DC2 Type R engine (JDM 147kw, 15kw less) even though it's way newer and displaces 200ccs more. 147/1.8*2.0=163.33, so the DC5's power per ltr is actually slightly less than the DC2 Type R engine.
The DC5 should be more economical than the DC2. The car is heavier, but as you say the engine is newer. So anyone with a Type S who drives similar to me should get the same or better economy.
Torino Red '94 DC2 Integra VTi-R :: 96fwkw @7300rpm & 138fwNm @4100rpm :: 0-100 in 7.3 seconds
when driving any car from 3 cylinder lawnmower to v12, as soon as you put load on it, then it will cosume more fuel.
load is basically pushing the pedal down more then required.
the trick is to get the car up to the desired speed with a moderate amount of gas, once there keep the acceleration within the rev range (example 2500 to 3500) and you should be fine.
the more you put load on it at such a low rev or high gear, the more it will drink and this fuel will go straight through the exhaust buddy.
Bookmarks