H22a Dyno results

[94vtirozguy]

the power figures are way off.

some guys with built bottom ends don't get 200kw (260 hp).

There is a car with more power, but that car had a heavily modified bottom end and the angles of the sleeves were changed to get this power.

[BaNaNaMaN]

the power figures are way off.

some guys with built bottom ends don't get 200kw (260 hp).

There is a car with more power, but that car had a heavily modified bottom end and the angles of the sleeves were changed to get this power.

Well we will just have to see how the next engine build goes. But I assure you the dyno is not some back yard special and the plot speaks for itself.

[ATSE]

Correction. it would have been good to see what times the car did down the qurater. That would have told the power story. But we will never know now.

Opps... correction noted... would.

As you stated the times would of proved the power statement of that motor. Even Bao's car with worked internals didn't make that power...

But netherless interesting to see what power the new engine makes. Record a video maybe....

[grumpy rooster]

A logical explanation is that the power was really hp at the wheels which would calculate to be ~150kw at the wheels. That is the sort of figure that makes more sense.

Then the fresh rebuild with decent bottom end I'd expect in the region of ~165kw+ dependant upon bore, compression etc.

[aus91integra]

does 1300 nm seem right?

[grumpy rooster]

That does seem very high too.

[94vtirozguy]

also another thing would be to see what SAE correction they used.. which is not stated on the dyno sheet

[EUR003act]

does 1300 nm seem right?

i think it'd be impossible for a 4cylinder to get 1300nm of torgue! not even 6litre v8s crack 1000 and they have a shit load more grunt

[grumpy rooster]

Its not torque, its tractive effort which is a multiplication of the torque through the gearbox, final drive etc.

Tractive effort will be higher than the engines torque.