Page 1 of 7 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 76
  1. #1
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Melbourne

    Accord V6 with VCM still no beating Aurion's FC?

    Accord V6
    $38,490
    Engine: 3.5-litre V6
    Power: 202kW at 6200rpm
    Torque: 339Nm at 5000rpm
    Transmission: Five-speed automatic
    Fuel consumption: 10.0L/100km

    With the much talked abt VCM, I expected it to do better than 10l/100km.. All figures are just on par with Aurion's 2GRFE. Could be due to its lacking of one gear ratio?

  2. #2
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Car:
    09 jazz
    ya, same concern as well, 10.0L/100km just normal consumption compare with its competitors if new Accord's VCM is working well. But i still need to get more detail on it later.

  3. #3
    Be interesting to see a dyno graph for this engine, might explain a few things.
    Better to have it and not need it, than need it and not have it.

  4. #4
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Newcastle
    Car:
    TRX400EX,TRD 3500S & BT50
    I guess time will tell, Claimed fuel consumption figures arent really that reliable, how many people have actually matched a claimed figure on average?!
    The few cars i drive differ considerably to what the manufacturers claim was.

    Be interesting to see what fuel consumption figures motor magazines obtain
    Bwwwwoooommmp

  5. #5
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Newcastle
    Car:
    96 CD5
    My 96 2.2L Vtec has the same fuel consumption as this 3.5L V6.
    OzAccord <-- Being rebuilt, but come say hi

  6. #6
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    CL9 Euro 6MT
    Car:
    Sydney
    To achieve the extra 2kw and 3nm above the Aurion, Honda had to sacrifice fuel consumption lol
    .© ♪

  7. #7
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    Accord V6-L
    It's a bigger car than the Aurion so maybe it weighs a lot more.

  8. #8
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Newcastle
    Car:
    TRX400EX,TRD 3500S & BT50
    Aurion: 1625kg Heaviest
    Accord: 1,650 heaviest

    25kgs
    Bwwwwoooommmp

  9. #9
    Honda engines love to rev...
    Better to have it and not need it, than need it and not have it.

  10. #10
    Ninja turtle Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Chloe
    One difference is that the Accord has an SOHC engine, while the Toyota has a DOHC engine.
    --------------------------------------
    Stocky CL9 - 1:17.2

  11. #11
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    CL9 Euro 6MT
    Car:
    Sydney
    So I guess the Aurion doesn't have variable lift AND variable cam angle (i-VVTi )?
    .© ♪

  12. #12
    Ninja turtle Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Chloe
    Quote Originally Posted by EuroDude View Post
    So I guess the Aurion doesn't have variable lift AND variable cam angle (i-VVTi )?
    It has VVTi, no lift. And fuel economy-wise VVTi on a DOHC engine is much better than i-VTEC on an SOHC engine. You should know why.
    --------------------------------------
    Stocky CL9 - 1:17.2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.