Care to explain the difference between where power is made between your "roots style" and a normal supercharger?
I'm going to butt in here. There is a huge difference between rootes and centrifugal blowers. Centrifugal blowers are for retards who want the worst characteristics of both turbo and supercharger installations. "Dyno queen blower" is an apt name for them.
So just what is the highest dyno graph ever posted for a N/A b16a on here
119kw@wheel was the highest but again dyno graph is nothing if its not backed up by 1/4 mile slip.
Different dyno , different operator , different way of strapping , different set up etc = different reading
I'm going to butt in here. There is a huge difference between rootes and centrifugal blowers. Centrifugal blowers are for retards who want the worst characteristics of both turbo and supercharger installations. "Dyno queen blower" is an apt name for them.
that's a pretty brave call.
Originally Posted by SPEEDCORE
That was the PCT slugs and BC header one yer?
119kw is yonas's own car i believe. BC header yes, stock pistons though.
I'm going to butt in here. There is a huge difference between rootes and centrifugal blowers. Centrifugal blowers are for retards who want the worst characteristics of both turbo and supercharger installations. "Dyno queen blower" is an apt name for them.
Originally Posted by barefootbonzai
that's a pretty brave call.
Not at all when you understand the boost curves of each. I'll leave it at that so this gets back on topic.
interesting.. i like the thread and the current topic... can someone start another thread for the tuning debate so this one doesn't get closed
Originally Posted by Slow96GSR
If 1 person has had bad luck with a product don’t condemn it until you yourself have tested it. Now if 10 pros have tried it and it sucked then I would trust their opinion.
Bookmarks