Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345
Results 49 to 53 of 53
  1. #49
    Team YCD President Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Earth
    Car:
    Honbaru Yum Cha
    That is why we have Dyno Days... Same dyno, same day... no arguments .... (Minus the fact the temperature changes throughout the day)
    146.8Kws @ Wheels Diesel CL9 Euro (SOLD), 2009 Honda VT Shadow, NC PRHT Mazda MX-5, Boxing SG Forester, Honda Civic Sport
    RenaultSport RS265 Trophy+

    Team Yum Cha Daily - The Dim Sum Revolution

    OzHonda's Public Relations Guru

  2. #50
    Ninja turtle Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Chloe
    Quote Originally Posted by yfin View Post
    Yeah I know you are an engineer - that is why you are so smart So am I right in saying that even a small drop in power at low RPM is going to correlate to an even bigger drop in torque at low RPM?

    And the same would not necessarily hold true at high RPM?

    The torque in that first Injen graph (without MR tech) is terrible. It dips below stock quite a few times in the curve - not just down low The revised Injen looks much better.
    At low RPM, a small drop in power is equivalent ot a small drop in torque. At high RPM, the same small drop in power is equivalent to a larger drop in torque.
    --------------------------------------
    Stocky CL9 - 1:17.2

  3. #51
    Quote Originally Posted by aaronng View Post
    At low RPM, a small drop in power is equivalent ot a small drop in torque. At high RPM, the same small drop in power is equivalent to a larger drop in torque.
    Then you can chuck gearing into the equation and throw the torque graph out even further

  4. #52
    Ninja turtle Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Chloe
    Quote Originally Posted by ginganggooly View Post
    Then you can chuck gearing into the equation and throw the torque graph out even further
    You're thinking about tractive force. That's the raw figure measured by the rollers.

    Power at the wheels (hp) = Torque at the wheels (lbf.ft) (corrected for gear ratio) x RPM/5252

    This is used to calculate power at the wheels on the dyno. A dyno can't measure power. It measures torque put down on the rollers (which have a known resistance) and then calculates the power from it using the engine RPM at each point.
    --------------------------------------
    Stocky CL9 - 1:17.2

  5. #53
    Quote Originally Posted by aaronng View Post
    You're thinking about tractive force. That's the raw figure measured by the rollers.

    Power at the wheels (hp) = Torque at the wheels (lbf.ft) (corrected for gear ratio) x RPM/5252

    This is used to calculate power at the wheels on the dyno. A dyno can't measure power. It measures torque put down on the rollers (which have a known resistance) and then calculates the power from it using the engine RPM at each point.
    I didn't realise that the dyno used engine rpm to calculate outputs, I assumed it was using roller speed vs tractive effort and whatever calculation is required to plot power.

    So when the operator calibrates engine RPM vs Speed on the dyno, its going a little deeper than just changing values on the graph?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.