you cant just go shifting the mens rea around like that, intent has to be more specific
I didn't mean that Recklessness was the same as carelessness; what was meant was: that the aspect of carlessness OF BEING reckless was not present.
The individual has created a device for the sole purpose of causing harm.
He was not wiring a device; and decided to leave the wires where the lay to be continued later (thus carelessness). He completed the device for it's intended purpose - to harm.
omg i can't believe that no one has mentioned about the advertisement about the monkey that stays in the boot and hits the thief if they try to steal it. LOL
If someone can find that video on YouTube it would be that much more sweet, thus u guys know what i am talkin abt
omg i can't believe that no one has mentioned about the advertisement about the monkey that stays in the boot and hits the thief if they try to steal it. LOL
If someone can find that video on YouTube it would be that much more sweet, thus u guys know what i am talkin abt
how nice. this is my first post in this forum. (=
anyways, I believe you were talking about this video?
Bookmarks