Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 22
  1. #1
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canberra
    Car:
    92 civic si

    EG civic VS peugeot 205 GTI

    Looking at upgrading (yes i think upgrading) from a EG si to an '87Peugeot 205 GTI. Has anyone driven both of these cars? I know i'll get alot of bias comments but what does everyone think?

  2. #2
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Perth
    Car:
    EGSi,DC2R,ED9
    In the 205 you sit more upright, steering much faster and sharper than your EG.

    Engine has sharper response and much better lower end torque but gets rough past 5500rpm from memory, whereas your ZC eng pulls cleanly all the way to 7K. I assume you are chasing the 1.9L version Mark1? or the 1.6L version? I've only driven the 89-91 models over the years with 1.9L.

    Suspension wise, out of the box the 205 gti handlings like a kart with stiff rear bar and very easy to modulate life off oversteer. In the EG you need to install a stiff bar for the same effect but not the same finesse. They weight less than the EGs too.

    build quality in the 205 is a far cry from the Jap built Hondas of course but I'm sure you are already aware of that.

    they have an active forum in Aust too, eg the aussiefrogs and few others i've came across over the years.

  3. #3
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Nipswich QLD
    Car:
    Holden IntegraL
    The 87 model has the 1.9L = 88kw but can achieve 0-100 in 8.5secs because it weighs less than 900kg.

    Biased or not, I'd stick with your EG. I'm not really fond of peugeots after my friend purchased a '98 306 and although it isn't 'that bad', quality is fairly mediocre compared to jap cars.

    So unless your passionate for french cars, it'll be a downgrade. Go with a 4age corolla if you're looking for a different car of similar age.

  4. #4
    i think u have more aftermarket support in hondas.. parts for peugeots are more expensive and harder to come by i think.

  5. #5
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    MX83 cressida
    Spend da money puttin a B series in the EG, you won't regret that!!
    Just buying a stock peugeot will not be a big upgrade if at all!!

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by rtsnoz View Post
    Looking at upgrading (yes i think upgrading) from a EG si to an '87Peugeot 205 GTI. Has anyone driven both of these cars? I know i'll get alot of bias comments but what does everyone think?
    How is this an Upgrade? I think the si with its 16v Twin Cam is a much much more superior engine and platform to the '87 Peugeot.

    Infact, its probably much more superior even to the last Peugot I tried..the Gti 180. Its much older..yes, but still more superior. :-p

  7. #7
    Ninja turtle Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Chloe
    Quote Originally Posted by e240 View Post
    How is this an Upgrade? I think the si with its 16v Twin Cam is a much much more superior engine and platform to the '87 Peugeot.

    Infact, its probably much more superior even to the last Peugot I tried..the Gti 180. Its much older..yes, but still more superior. :-p
    But... the 205 GTI handling is superior to the Si.
    --------------------------------------
    Stocky CL9 - 1:17.2

  8. #8
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    MX83 cressida
    Quote Originally Posted by aaronng View Post
    But... the 205 GTI handling is superior to the Si.
    I had an EG, put some bigger swaybars on it, a camber kit and some koni yellows and nice low stiff springs and the thing would have eaten pretty much anything on corners, on a tighter budget, 22mm sways would make a big difference at under 150 bucks each with new bushes also!

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by aaronng View Post
    But... the 205 GTI handling is superior to the Si.
    So they say..I didn't find it so..

  10. #10
    Ninja turtle Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Chloe
    Quote Originally Posted by e240 View Post
    So they say..I didn't find it so..
    Stock compared to stock
    --------------------------------------
    Stocky CL9 - 1:17.2

  11. #11
    if you've watched any top gear, you'd know that french cars are bad. the reliability of them just don't stack up to anything like Hondas. It'll cost you alot to fix problems especially with older ones. In my opinion, you'll be down grading.

  12. #12
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    syd
    Car:
    560hp
    french, italian, swiss cars = rubbish.
    i know.
    trust.
    lol.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.