Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 13 to 24 of 24
  1. #13
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Northern NSW
    Car:
    EF Civic track car
    hehe, yeah i think they would help a fare bit exspecially at high speed, but i don't know if i could do it.. they do look a little strange. hehe

  2. #14
    crx is a better base... much better then an LS

    LS needs mods to get it to handle as good as a crx...

    if i had my choice again.. id go crx..

    what do you mean when u say twitchy.. how low is your crx? any suspension mods?

    my h22 LS weighs in at 1170 with full interior..

  3. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by aus91integra View Post
    crx is a better base... much better then an LS

    LS needs mods to get it to handle as good as a crx...
    If you're going to make blanket statements such as this at least back it up with some evidence. Why is the CRX a better base? Or better - under what conditions is a CRX a better base?

    Both cars don't handle greatly in stock trim, so comparing standard performance - especially in the context of an off-road race car - is entirely pointless.

    Did you get your car weighed to get that 1170 figure or did you just have a guess?
    Last edited by string; 16-05-2007 at 09:01 PM.

  4. #16
    my car was weighed at a vicroads weighbridge as part of the engineering and registration process..

    I have tracked both my LS' h22 and my standard LS.. and in comparison to the 88 crx.. the crx is more nimble and will exit corners at a faster speed.. and this was a d16a CRX.. in comparison to b18a LS these comparisons were done at winton and sandown.

    i have found that a standard LS has understeer issues .. to correct this i found that a thicker rear sway bar needs to be added.. this will induce slight oversteer in which you can control with throttle..

    as much as i love the LS you need to be realistic and unbias in judgement

  5. #17
    What suspension on your H22 LS? New shocks? Heavy H22 up front no wonder it handles badly. Specifically, what was it with the addition of your "thicker" sway bar? How thick? What tyres did you have on both cars, the same? How about the condition of the bushes, and your alignment settings, same on both cars?

    I think you need to be realistic with your comparasin methods. Comparing two 16+ year old cars, you need to start taking into account what has happened to each car over those years, because unless they both have never been driven before, you can bet your last dollar that they will be in considerably different conditions (not necessarily any worse, just worn in different manners). Alternately, you can replace worn components to new specifications; but from the words "standard" and "d16" I doubt that happened.

    Most front wheel drives have understeer issues. Hence why the DC2R is so stiffly sprung in the rear, to increase front grip, not reduce rear grip.
    Last edited by string; 16-05-2007 at 09:33 PM.

  6. #18
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Audi TT 2.0T
    hes comparing standard with standard
    FFR33K - SOLD
    LSV73C - SOLD
    CW DC5R - SOLD

  7. #19
    Did you read my second paragraph? These cars are over 15 years old and obviously in completely different condition to stock. Also, standard suspension tune obviously wasn't geared towards performance; who's to say that honda didn't want to make the DA9 a bit more comfy at the expensive of performance. Making blanket statements about using a chassis as a base, comparing by measuring the performance of 15 year old standard machine, is futile at best - especially when it comes to race time, where all those stock components are in a box in the garage, and bushes in the bin.

  8. #20
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    Honda Integra
    it says on the rego sticker... 1147 for the auto

  9. #21
    In NSW it's on the Rego paper. Mine says 1087, manual.

  10. #22
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Melb
    Car:
    AP1 S2000
    both cars would be great, one could say that the crx would be better on sharper corners such as hill climb work where as the longer wheelbase of the teg would give better stablility through longer corners.

    so maybe the teg at the island and the crx at winton...??


    $0.02

  11. #23
    I have a 91 DA9 with B16a, KYB adjustable firmness on the front and Koni adjustable height/firm on the rear, have not done the swaybar yet but have been able to keep up or outdo a lot of cars around sharper corners I know well, yes it's an old car and maybe not the first choice for people as a race car, but there are many cars that can be made to handle well with sensible mods. I also have top and bottom bracing.

    I had a semi-professional racer friend drive my car recently and he was hitting corners so hard I thought I was going to die, I was extremely impressed by the capabilities of my car, I am going to get him to take it around Eastern Creek (Wife wont let me, long story) just to see how it will do.

    Whatever car you choose to get (or keep with), just make sure it's something that makes you happy, you are doing the right thing by asking questions, this will save you heaps of money in the end.

    Cheers, Chris
    Every Day You Don't Practice, Is A Day You Get Worse
    (\__/)
    (='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste bunny into your
    (")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.

  12. #24
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Northern NSW
    Car:
    EF Civic track car
    Quote Originally Posted by aus91integra View Post
    crx is a better base... much better then an LS

    LS needs mods to get it to handle as good as a crx...

    if i had my choice again.. id go crx..

    what do you mean when u say twitchy.. how low is your crx? any suspension mods?

    my h22 LS weighs in at 1170 with full interior..
    The car has koni adjustable suspension all round, with lowered king springs, its got about 2.5-3 degrees negative camber on the front and about 0.6 on the back.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.