Thats the thing with AWD - if you launch them hard they will break (but be VERY quick)....or if you launch them carefully they will bog down....its hard to launch a AWD that you plan on keeping for a while!
not really, just slip the clutch, box wont break but your clutch wont last very long if you do it too often
This is funny.
I know this is a Honda forum and all... but....
If these three cars were racing on a mountain pass "TOO GAY" style, with identical drivers, then of course the EVO would have it all over the other two cars.
I think the race would be more between the sti and the evo....the s2000 is just not gonna threaten those two....in my opinion, i think the sti will win...
HAHA this thread is a joke, i mean the s2k is a great car and id love to have one, but reality check people.
THE EVO WILL WIN.
All this talk of amuse s2k this and amuse s2k is stupid, yes its an awesome and quick car as is the 3litre nsx which won another round of touge battles.
But really how can you compare modified cars?
its just a battle of who has spent the most money, or who has the better tuning house and driver...
If you want to accurately compare cars like that they need to be stock, and when stock the evo is much better package outa the box than the honda or suby. Simple.
As much as i love Hondas, there is not subsitute for a turbo rush and the gains achieved compared to N/A .....very close call but i think the EVO would win....there handling is a tad better than the STI
"When the christmas light drops the b***sh*t
stops"
04 Jazz VTI-S
99 WRX
97 Lancer MR
Originally Posted by VTEC16
Bookmarks