0-100 Times for DC5 R and S?

[coladuna]

Now you're making stupid points. A Ferrari is nowhere near the same price as a WRX. That was such a dumb comment to make. And you're totally wrong. You can easily get a good Supra RZ for $40K or less. A Supra is not "Much more expensive" than a WRX.

How old is that $40K supra you are talking about? lol
95? something along that line? WRX is $40K brand new if you haven't noticed this obvious fact. Therefore, Supra is hell of a lot more expensive than a WRX. They cost more than $100K when it was brand new.

5. I mention the Silvia because it is not a POS. They are cheap and powerfull. If you don't agree then there's something wrong with you. Yes their build quality isn't great, and they're not as refined as most Hondas or perhaps Subaru's, but they're fast and RWD which is good for launching hard.

Oh well. You are free to think they are not a POS. I beg to differ. They are loud, sound horrible, terrible build quality, ugly and old. It has to be one of the most feral looking cars on the road.

You think your $40K for 5.9 seconds is good, how about $25K for a Supra RZ that does 0-100 in low 5 seconds?

Why keep comparing old car price to a brand new car price? Even an idiot would make a better comparison.

Just so we're clear, I don't hate WRXs. Like I said, they're great for rally or any time you need grip. Great road cars as the tail isn't a bit slip happy like a Supra and they have more predictable understeer. But they just aren't as fast as a Supra RZ or GT-R Skyline in a line, both of which you can get for about the same price.

Fair enough Supra RZ or GT-R skyline are faster. I don't intend to dispute such an obvious fact. However, I'm a little over you making ridiculous comparison over and over again. $25K? Why not mention 20 year old Commodore that costs less than $20K but bloody fast?
When you are comparing second hand cars against a new car, the whole argument falls apart.