Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 76
  1. #13
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Car:
    Civic RS
    10l/100km is pretty good for that size engine i think, the euro claims 9.1 (2.4l), currently im on 8.4-8.6 with 1/2 city/hwy driving, my bro has the new kluger with he aurion engine in it it has been doing 16-17l/100k, yes its 4wd and should be heavier, but thats a massive difference when they claim 11l/100km kluger, so maybe the 10 for the aurion is ambitious as well
    |||8|0||0|||5|7||||

  2. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by 80057 View Post
    10l/100km is pretty good for that size engine i think, the euro claims 9.1 (2.4l), currently im on 8.4-8.6 with 1/2 city/hwy driving, my bro has the new kluger with he aurion engine in it it has been doing 16-17l/100k, yes its 4wd and should be heavier, but thats a massive difference when they claim 11l/100km kluger, so maybe the 10 for the aurion is ambitious as well
    11L/100km is a combined figure though.

    Your brother is most likely quoting fuel consumption of just urban driving only.
    Better to have it and not need it, than need it and not have it.

  3. #15
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Quote Originally Posted by 80057 View Post
    10l/100km is pretty good for that size engine i think, the euro claims 9.1 (2.4l), currently im on 8.4-8.6 with 1/2 city/hwy driving, my bro has the new kluger with he aurion engine in it it has been doing 16-17l/100k, yes its 4wd and should be heavier, but thats a massive difference when they claim 11l/100km kluger, so maybe the 10 for the aurion is ambitious as well
    I'd better rely on ADR figures to tell the "norm"

  4. #16
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    CL9 Euro 6MT
    Car:
    Sydney
    Quote Originally Posted by 80057 View Post
    10l/100km is pretty good for that size engine i think, the euro claims 9.1 (2.4l), currently im on 8.4-8.6 with 1/2 city/hwy driving, my bro has the new kluger with he aurion engine in it it has been doing 16-17l/100k, yes its 4wd and should be heavier, but thats a massive difference when they claim 11l/100km kluger, so maybe the 10 for the aurion is ambitious as well
    New cars always consume a lot of fuel when new. My euro consumed around 17L/100k initially (normal driving), now its down to 9.~L/100km. Its gotta be driven for 5000km - 10000km km before judging the consumption, which I think is what many car magazines forget to do when they test drive a brand new car.
    .© ♪

  5. #17
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Newcastle
    Car:
    96 CD5
    Quote Originally Posted by EuroDude View Post
    New cars always consume a lot of fuel when new. My euro consumed around 17L/100k initially (normal driving), now its down to 9.~L/100km. Its gotta be driven for 5000km - 10000km km before judging the consumption, which I think is what many car magazines forget to do when they test drive a brand new car.
    Hmm any idea why this is? thats very interesting. true fact? or just what u have recognised?
    OzAccord <-- Being rebuilt, but come say hi

  6. #18
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    CL9 Euro 6MT
    Car:
    Sydney
    New engines aren't manufactured perfectly so there is a period of wearing-in where engine parts come in contact with each other which causes friction and release metal particles into the oil, and as a result, causes higher fuel consumption.
    .© ♪

  7. #19
    Ninja turtle Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Chloe
    Quote Originally Posted by EuroDude View Post
    New cars always consume a lot of fuel when new. My euro consumed around 17L/100k initially (normal driving), now its down to 9.~L/100km. Its gotta be driven for 5000km - 10000km km before judging the consumption, which I think is what many car magazines forget to do when they test drive a brand new car.
    Was that 17L/100km the first ever tank? Or did you still get that from the 2nd and 3rd tank? I got 11L/100km for my 2nd tank.
    --------------------------------------
    Stocky CL9 - 1:17.2

  8. #20
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    BMW Showroom
    Car:
    BMW
    filled up the v6l the other night, 723kms to empty!

    just remember what is on the sticker is combined driving. so alot of freeway and some city driving. so most cars will prob read a bit higher than sticker, but on freeway all the time is a different story again!
    im not biased, i just tell it how it is.

  9. #21
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    CL9 Euro 6MT
    Car:
    Sydney
    Quote Originally Posted by aaronng View Post
    Was that 17L/100km the first ever tank? Or did you still get that from the 2nd and 3rd tank? I got 11L/100km for my 2nd tank.
    It was 17L for a few weeks but gradually went down to 9.xL after 10000km if I recall correctly.
    .© ♪

  10. #22
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Car:
    09 jazz
    Quote Originally Posted by UNLS1 View Post
    filled up the v6l the other night, 723kms to empty!

    just remember what is on the sticker is combined driving. so alot of freeway and some city driving. so most cars will prob read a bit higher than sticker, but on freeway all the time is a different story again!
    Woo, u mean that V6L's first tank? The result just amazing!

  11. #23
    I think the 723 is reading from the trip meter??

  12. #24
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane - Northside
    Car:
    EK4K24
    stop cheating comparing it to an aurion... an aurion is more sporty and the accord is made to contend to the camry lol

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.