Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 13 to 24 of 24

Thread: what options?

  1. #13
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    NZ
    Car:
    96 JDM Legend 'Exclusive'
    Quote Originally Posted by Dominik
    Maaaate... Dont close the gap by getting bigger tyres! Close the gap by DUMPING your car!!! Haha... Either that or get 24"s - straight blingin'!
    I tend to agree with dom on this one. 50 profile tyres on 17's are too big. Besides that will really throw your rolling diameter out. According to the online calculator http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html when I went from my 195/60/15 to 17's the closest and best match is 205/45/17, but I opted for the 215/45 as Iwould have slightly more sidewall for a more family orientated ride - well as much as I want! Speedo will be out by 1.7%

    If I went for 205/50 I would have been out by 3.5% and the 215/50 would be out by 5.2%. Way too far!

    But damn those high performance tyres are noisy!

    Raz
    Cars
    1996 KA9 JDM Honda Legend 'Exclusive'

  2. #14
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    VIP Nissan Cima
    God, i wonder how many hits that Miata.net site gets thanks to it's tire calculator! I love it!

    My 205/40s are 4% smaller than standard wheels, but at my height you cant tell
    And having the speedo reading 4% fast means that i am less likely to speed...

  3. #15
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    95 Accord
    After Yesterdays cruise, i liked how the car was handeling and all that just mega pist about the height of the front, the back sits just above the wheel, if i just lowered the front another 25 mm ill be happy, this couldnt affect the height of the back in some weird way???? its just my luck that somethig like that would happen to me even if i mean it unitentionally!!!

  4. #16
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    wagga wagga
    Car:
    CD5 vti-s
    i have only lowered mine 30mm all round. i like it. it would look better slammed on its ass but i wanted performance without sacrificing comfort. My ride height is what they should have offered when the car was new.

  5. #17
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    VIP Nissan Cima
    Just get the front springs reset. That wont affect the height of the rear springs - but it might make the front springs stiffer; which leads to more understeer (could offset that with a rear swaybar)

  6. #18
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    wagga wagga
    Car:
    CD5 vti-s
    IMO the accords come from the factory sitting a bit higher at the front, wouldnt this be a result of the car having to sit higher for sufficient suspension travel.

    Ive noticed that when ppl lower their 5th gen accords so that the front guard sits level with the front tyre that the exhaust A pipe sits extremely close to the ground which can be a pain in the ass and i am only assuming that it must be a really harsh ride as the suspension would have next to no travel before rebounding of the bumpstops.

    here is a pic of my car lowered, not by much but i can take it on the roughest of roads and it glides over everything without bouncing, bottoming out, or even upsetting the balance of the car if u hit a bump mid corner at high speeds.

    as i fitted king springs with monroe shocks, i honestly thought the ride would be shithouse becuase thats what everyone said it would be, but all i can say is that the ride quality, (performance and comfort) is about 500% better than i thought it would be and about 2000% better than 10 year old stock suspension!!!
    [IMG][/IMG]

  7. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by simpdogg
    After Yesterdays cruise, i liked how the car was handeling and all that just mega pist about the height of the front, the back sits just above the wheel, if i just lowered the front another 25 mm ill be happy, this couldnt affect the height of the back in some weird way???? its just my luck that somethig like that would happen to me even if i mean it unitentionally!!!
    Correct me if I'm wrong.. cos I only went with my "feels" as I adjust my hi low coilovers myself..
    It seems like you are more after handling.. or at least you are hoping not to have it as a trade-off for looks. I found having the front tilting a little promote more responsive handling. (of cos, when I say tilting, it should match up with the height of the back as well)

    I don't know much about exact and complex calculations; I know the ride-height of my set affects the the spring-rate; the lower I drop, the softer it is.
    I only dropped down around 50mm more couple of weeks ago, the handling has changed dramatically. All the alignments were out; cambers were out by at least 2 degrees ++ and more understeering.. which I personally like when it comes into roundabouts.

    My point is.. having the front tilting a little isn't all that bad for handling. There are way too many variations on suspension setup, you really need someone who has experience on it to tell you what would do what.

    Good luck.

  8. #20
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    95 Accord
    When i was chatting with toe and few other guys about it, i mentioned something that i was told from my mate who had a vnss a few years back, (hahaha im the only honda boy in the group!!!) that with the strut brace being mounted in the front it has made the front grip like anything the handeling is fantastic anyhow by adding a rear sway bar to the setup now i would be taking out the flex and movement from the rear springs because im making it stiffer, so if i put the car into a corner hard, id be more inclined to have the tail slip out or move on me because the rear wheels wont counter act what the front is doing because there is no flex at all, it makes sense and i can see a valid point to it, wondering on the accruacy of it though.
    imo i think factory cars should come out with better sus setups, from driving stock sus, to now upgraded i feel so much more confident with my driving and the car, not saying im pushing the limits of the car or myself but, you feel alot more safer. i tried to post a few pics but it wont let me

  9. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by simpdogg
    When i was chatting with toe and few other guys about it, i mentioned something that i was told from my mate who had a vnss a few years back, (hahaha im the only honda boy in the group!!!) that with the strut brace being mounted in the front it has made the front grip like anything the handeling is fantastic anyhow by adding a rear sway bar to the setup now i would be taking out the flex and movement from the rear springs because im making it stiffer, so if i put the car into a corner hard, id be more inclined to have the tail slip out or move on me because the rear wheels wont counter act what the front is doing because there is no flex at all, it makes sense and i can see a valid point to it, wondering on the accruacy of it though.
    imo i think factory cars should come out with better sus setups, from driving stock sus, to now upgraded i feel so much more confident with my driving and the car, not saying im pushing the limits of the car or myself but, you feel alot more safer. i tried to post a few pics but it wont let me
    Sounds like de idea.. just becareful not to over do it esp with stablisers, an oversteering FF car is not fun and not something that you wanted, esp in the rain.

  10. #22
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    VIP Nissan Cima
    The reason is comfort. The Accord is a family sedan, not meant for a slalom course (of course, we can make it so that it *can* go round corners great) but thats not what it was designed for. The other thing is, just lowering your car usually doesnt do that much for the handling. It will *feel* like it corners better, but in reality you could have done the same corner with stock suspension (albeit with massive bodyroll, and some squeeling brakes). Thats why stock suspension is as soft as it is. Try driving an MR2 or a lotus elise (a car designed to handle well from the factory), and it is a different story...

    Though, what your friend with the VNSS was saying is probably true; you want stiffer rear suspension than the front (with the use of swaybars); to reduce understeer...

  11. #23
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    wagga wagga
    Car:
    CD5 vti-s
    also a front strut brace will also do wonders for the cornering ability of your accord. you can get an adjustable one on ebay for 50 bux but the only thing is that you have to relocate the clutch resivour down a little lower for clearance purposes.

    I agree that accords are built as a comforable family sedan but they have used them for touring cars in other parts of the world

    Did you know that the v8 supercar commodores changed from a mcpherson strut front suspension to double wishbone (same as accords) so that they would handle better and be on par with the super car ford falcons.

    its a very good design of suspension that accords have. the difference between comfort and sport is very easily changed with different spring rates, camber kits, sway bars and shock absorbers.

  12. #24
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Car:
    EM1, JAZZ, ITR, EURO
    Good post!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.