Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 49 to 60 of 71

Thread: b18c head

  1. #49
    Account Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    CT9A

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by dsp26 View Post
    got most of that already minus the block and ecu.. hoping i can run the jdm p30 rom fine.

    the bit i wanted clarified was the rods... naturally with internet posts theres misguided info.

    the rod part, my researc lead me to believe that:
    - Rods are weak and can't handle 8krpm+
    OR
    - like the crvtec b20 frank, it was the rod bolts that was holding it back due to the 1.54 R/S ratio that made the oem ones bend...

    so which is it? i need to replace rods or just the bolts?

    i don't mind not being able to rev past 8krpm as the purpose for this is lowend power anyway...

    will look for tu88ys thread in the meantime... thanks
    best is to get a tunable ecu, crome hondata.

    change the rod bolts. stock rods can handle 8500 rpm.

    The LS rods are the same as B20 rods. Change the rod bearings to the ITR ones. Add headstuds if budget permits.
    Last edited by fatboyz39; 21-05-2008 at 02:20 PM.

  2. #50
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    101 MotorCafe Performance/Tuning
    Car:
    01POV
    Quote Originally Posted by aramiK View Post
    I've also heard that the b18c2 head works better then the b18cr head for worked engines - IE , engines with work done to the block.. and cams etc for the head.

    Is this correct?
    No it's not correct.

    Only time a b18c2 head is gonna perform better than an ITR head is if it has been ported right which cost $$.
    |=TeamPOV=|=JDMYard=|=EK Squad=|=101 MotorCafe Performance Tuning=|

    EK Koni Yellows + King Spring Combo for Sale

  3. #51
    Account Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    93 EG Civic
    Quote Originally Posted by barefootbonzai View Post
    No it's not correct.

    Only time a b18c2 head is gonna perform better than an ITR head is if it has been ported right which cost $$.
    Really? Hmm, so what was all that other talk in this thread about the advantages of the b18c2 head?

    Highjacking topic now but, if I'm building a high power b18c build, should I look into getting the type R head and doing the cams for that etc?

    Someone told me the b18c2 provides much higher compression etc?

  4. #52
    Account Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    CT9A
    Quote Originally Posted by aramiK View Post
    Really? Hmm, so what was all that other talk in this thread about the advantages of the b18c2 head?

    Highjacking topic now but, if I'm building a high power b18c build, should I look into getting the type R head and doing the cams for that etc?

    Someone told me the b18c2 provides much higher compression etc?
    Yeah slapping a P72 head will raise the comp 0.7 ?

  5. #53
    Account Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    93 EG Civic
    I have no idea? I'm asking not telling...

    Just looooking for adviceeeeeeeeeeee yooooooooooooo!

  6. #54
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Car:
    380GT,XTrailSTR
    Quote Originally Posted by aramiK View Post
    I have no idea? I'm asking not telling...

    Just looooking for adviceeeeeeeeeeee yooooooooooooo!
    lol... he was telling.. the "?" at the end of his post was a typo... love t3h internetz
    Quote Originally Posted by Slow96GSR
    If 1 person has had bad luck with a product don’t condemn it until you yourself have tested it. Now if 10 pros have tried it and it sucked then I would trust their opinion.

  7. #55
    Account Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    CT9A
    im not sure how much comp it'll raise. either 0.7 or 1.7

  8. #56
    Account Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    93 EG Civic
    Ok so dose that mean for overall use if your going to be port/polishing, cams, springs etc etc the head will be better for P72 or P3 XD

  9. #57
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    [ACT]
    Car:
    Integra
    pretty sure its to do with the different size and shape of the quench pads on the two different heads. a gsr/b18c2 head will raise the compression slightly because of this characteristic.

  10. #58
    Account Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    93 EG Civic
    But does that make it a BETTER head to work? ???

  11. #59
    Quote Originally Posted by dudeling7 View Post
    pretty sure its to do with the different size and shape of the quench pads on the two different heads. a gsr/b18c2 head will raise the compression slightly because of this characteristic.
    The GSR head raises compression due to the small combustion chamber volume. The quench pads exist due to the shape of the combustion chamber and other than reducing the head plane CC area, has no bearing on CC volume.

  12. #60
    Account Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    CT9A
    Worked Pr3 vs a worked P72 = Worked Pr3 wins.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.