Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 25 to 36 of 37
  1. #25
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Car:
    380GT,XTrailSTR
    ^^^exactly right.... kings spring rates aren't suitable for the koni's... no-one gets kings for performance, their showboat springs specifically for lowering.

    their results exceed other adjustables like tokico's and AGX in terms of rebound when matched to the correct spring...

    i posted about them here:
    http://www.ozhonda.com/forum/showthr...highlight=dyno


    To the OP since he hasn't replied, this is where I get my sussy from which has the KYB, Koni & Tokicos he's after, shipping is around US$140 from memory:
    http://stores.ebay.com/jdmwerks13_W0...Q3amesstQQtZkm

    ^^^Out of stock of the Koni's and Ilumina Rs by the look of it, best email them...



    [QUOTE=EKVTIR-T;1738431]
    I was hoping to get better rebound control over bumps and dips as I enjoy twisty/mountain type driving which isn't always a perfect surface.
    ^^^function of damp setting+spring rate combo

    Also a little less body roll and improved steering response considering the uprated valving compared to oem.
    ^^^stiff damp doesn't fix body roll, stiff spring rates or bigger swaybars do

    And better absorption of road irregularities.
    ^^^function of damp setting+spring rate combo

    I have tried the range of rebound adjustment with all 3 springs fitted.
    ^^^what were the spring rates on all 3 springs? coz rule of thumb with koni's has always been to get the eibachs/gc or similar.

    Science is all well and good if all things are equal and also there's the human element as well.
    ^^^yep
    Last edited by dsp26; 09-06-2008 at 11:58 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Slow96GSR
    If 1 person has had bad luck with a product don’t condemn it until you yourself have tested it. Now if 10 pros have tried it and it sucked then I would trust their opinion.

  2. #26
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    www.alibaba.com
    Car:
    porsche boxster
    Quote Originally Posted by dsp26 View Post
    ^^^stiff damp doesn't fix body roll, stiff spring rates or bigger swaybars do
    I think it contributes to less body movement but not as an independent solution.
    I've already got f/r sways too.

  3. #27
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    DB9
    yeh, id stiffer shocks do contribute to less body roll, its a combination of things

    ther isnt one single solution

    stiffer shock, stiffer spring and bars
    Team Yum Cha Daily
    Melb Crew reppin


    .....an era has ended.....RIP YF dc2^3

    "I do apologise for what must seem like an arbitrary imposition"

  4. #28
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    FD2 N/A what?
    I was just given a set of used KYB shocks and springs today...for free!

    What should I look out for when using secondhand shocks? They look like they are in good condition. Although I might not use the springs as they aren't for lowering.

  5. #29
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Car:
    380GT,XTrailSTR
    Quote Originally Posted by xenonkuraz View Post
    I was just given a set of used KYB shocks and springs today...for free!

    What should I look out for when using secondhand shocks? They look like they are in good condition. Although I might not use the springs as they aren't for lowering.
    if your taking about KYB Exel-Gs/GR2s... manufacturer states you shouldn't exceed 1.5in lower than oem...
    Quote Originally Posted by Slow96GSR
    If 1 person has had bad luck with a product don’t condemn it until you yourself have tested it. Now if 10 pros have tried it and it sucked then I would trust their opinion.

  6. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by EKVTIR-T View Post
    I think it contributes to less body movement but not as an independent solution.
    I've already got f/r sways too.
    It can't contribute to body roll final angle as it does not store any energy. The only way it possibly could reduce your roll movements is if your previous damper is hideously underdamping the movement and jumping past the point of maximum roll before returning to it. Regardless, the energy from the roll has to be stored somewhere to be returned when you return the wheel - the springs store it and determine how far you roll, not the shock. They certainly will give you that feeling of less body roll, which further reinforces the point that body roll really isn't the enemy.
    Last edited by string; 09-06-2008 at 03:13 PM.

  7. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by aaronng View Post
    The spring rate has to be matched to the damping rate. If he has soft springs, then the Konis won't be the best choice for him.
    I know it would be better with stiffer springs, but the stiffer the Konis are set the better my CB7s handling becomes, even with the very soft stock springs (stock CB7 is approx 180lbs front / 110lbs rear, roughly calculated from the spring dimensions).

    The Konis don't decrease the amount of ultimate roll, but they do slow the rate of that roll, so on stiffer dampers (e.g. a Koni on a stiffer setting) in a given corner the car may roll less because it reaches X roll angle more slowly, but with a softer setting the car will roll more because the chassis may well reach a steady state earlier.

    On long corners such as roundabouts, the Konis (or any dampers) still allow just as much roll as softer dampers, but you're a bit further into the corner before you reach roll angle X.

    The damper absorbs energy and then dissipates it as heat. It's this absorbtion of energy that causes the rate of roll motion to be lowered, more so the stiffer the damper is.
    Last edited by JohnL; 09-06-2008 at 10:11 PM.

  8. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by EKVTIR-T View Post
    I have used them with king,gab and vision springs and find they made no real improvement over my oem shocks.

    And do me a favour by not suggesting all your negative possibilities for me being displeased with Koni.
    I feel they don't live up to all the hype but I'm glad you are happy with yours.
    We all have our own ideas and opinions and experiences and I don't need you to defend them based on your opinions
    I will be selling them at some stage and getting a replacement setup.
    I'm curious as to how you come to such conclusions, or rather why your experience is as you state it.

    Koni are renowned for a decently stiff rebound rate at the stiffer end of the settings, and also for their forgiving nature over larger bumps due to their digressive force curve.

    You're experience is contrary to everything I've read regarding Konis and to my own personal experience of them.

    Check out this for some interesting reading on dampers; http://farnorthracing.com/autocross_secrets6.html

  9. #33
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    www.alibaba.com
    Car:
    porsche boxster
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnL View Post
    I'm curious as to how you come to such conclusions, or rather why your experience is as you state it.

    Koni are renowned for a decently stiff rebound rate at the stiffer end of the settings, and also for their forgiving nature over larger bumps due to their digressive force curve.

    You're experience is contrary to everything I've read regarding Konis and to my own personal experience of them.

    Check out this for some interesting reading on dampers; http://farnorthracing.com/autocross_secrets6.html
    I know what you mean.And I have that link already from ages ago
    Maybe it's just after reading so much about them I had built up a high expectation.

    Your explanation regarding the body roll resistance was great and I agree.

  10. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by EKVTIR-T View Post
    I know what you mean.And I have that link already from ages ago
    Maybe it's just after reading so much about them I had built up a high expectation.
    It sounds to me like you might have been expecting magic results from them, they are only dampers after all, and only part of the set up, albeit very good dampers and a very important part of the set up. The other thing that crosses my mind, could one (or more) of your Konis be defective?

    My biggest issue with the Konis on the soft stock springs is that the Konis feel softer in bump than I would like. I suspect this is not the dampers fault so much as the springs being too soft so that they don't 'assist' the damper to resist bump loadings enough, i.e. the combined bump rates of the damper + spring feels very soft compared to the high damper rebound rate on a stiff setting. It's possible that on a less stiff rebound setting the dampers won't feel so 'rebound' heavy / bump light', but then my car doesn't handle as well on softer rebound settings...

    Stiffer springs would most probably fix this feeling of the bump rate being too soft by adding bump stiffness, and by making the damper work harder in rebound, i.e. effectively softening the damper in rebound (if you follow my meaning), so the total bump stiffness / resistance (spring + damper) becomes greater in absolute terms as well as relative to the effective rebound stiffness (?).

  11. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by dsp26 View Post
    lol, what do you mean?

    Theres Ilumina, Ilumina R (coilover), D Spec (coilover)?
    dunno, the US branded Tokico's just doesn't seem right - I can't put my finger on it. I use to use a Japanese one in Singapore, which was really good - just can't seem to get it from the US sites.
    MFactory Competition Products

  12. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnL View Post
    It sounds to me like you might have been expecting magic results from them, they are only dampers after all, and only part of the set up, albeit very good dampers and a very important part of the set up. The other thing that crosses my mind, could one (or more) of your Konis be defective?

    My biggest issue with the Konis on the soft stock springs is that the Konis feel softer in bump than I would like. I suspect this is not the dampers fault so much as the springs being too soft so that they don't 'assist' the damper to resist bump loadings enough, i.e. the combined bump rates of the damper + spring feels very soft compared to the high damper rebound rate on a stiff setting. It's possible that on a less stiff rebound setting the dampers won't feel so 'rebound' heavy / bump light', but then my car doesn't handle as well on softer rebound settings...

    Stiffer springs would most probably fix this feeling of the bump rate being too soft by adding bump stiffness, and by making the damper work harder in rebound, i.e. effectively softening the damper in rebound (if you follow my meaning), so the total bump stiffness / resistance (spring + damper) becomes greater in absolute terms as well as relative to the effective rebound stiffness (?).
    His got his own opinions about them & you do as well. Why can't you just leave it instead of constantly trying to say that his wrong and to bring up all this stuff which he already knows about.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.