-
-
Originally Posted by marcoardeno
this dyno was done by a member of fitfreak.net, not from any trader or so. and every1 whove used it gave me a positive feedback so I second this!!
Thx for the link haha
-
Thanks for doing the dyno test. i'm putting the same intake in this sat! well at least looks like the same simota intake
-
6.2kw gain , at the wheels on a jazz ? Thats atleast 10kw at the engine.
You dont get these gains on larger engines from just replacing the intake.
So...does it feel any better or is this just a number ?
-
pwoarr NICE i wonder what i gain with my SRI
-
bear in mind.. ppl from fitfreak is a worldwide community.. including the USA n Europeans which has high reading dyno.. at best you are looking at 3-4kw atw max..
JDM Ek4 Squad Perth..
Originally Posted by Chi
Fact is you should get over ur EK4, cos its a POS FWD and its in the worse colour ever released.
Get a real car then start bragging.
-
Originally Posted by marcoardeno
mine is arriving next week but again just for some info:
1. the dyno wasnt conducted by a seller, but was done by a customer + a user of fitfreak.net
2. the dyno was done in a manual L15A vtec
3. the dyno doesnt seem to be reading high, start at 65kw atw sounds fair
I would like to dyno mine after putting this intake, but seriously can anyone tell me how to dyno cvt cars properly? some people have said not to use power vs rpm graph but use power vs speed, G-tech pro manual said to go power vs time instead...
65kw atw seems a lil higher than normal la.. lol..lesser than 20% drive train loss..lol..high 50s to 60kw atw den is jus nice..also jazz lose more kw atw for auto..
this guy in ozhonda did headers,hi flow cat,(no Bpipe) with muffler i assume, crankshaft pulley & a APEXI INTAKE!!!... got 67.9kw atw.. lol.. how a stock jazz got 65kw atw if its not high reading.. cant gain only 2.9kw with all those mods i am sure..
http://www.ozhonda.com/forum/showthr...ight=jazz+dyno
Last edited by VT1-R; 17-07-2008 at 01:17 PM.
JDM Ek4 Squad Perth..
Originally Posted by Chi
Fact is you should get over ur EK4, cos its a POS FWD and its in the worse colour ever released.
Get a real car then start bragging.
-
I find this hard to beleive from a intake that has the filter located in a hot engine bay. It might get a few more kw's on a dyno since the car's only been running for a few mins but after 30mins of driving I'd like to see how effective it is then.
Jazz: stock, K&N panel filter.
120 Series Prado GXL Petrol: Pacemaker extractors, Dual 2 1/4" exhaust, 70 series MT STZ's, ARB non-winch bullbar, snorkel, Dimpled and slotted rotors.
-
Originally Posted by BiLL|z0r
I find this hard to beleive from a intake that has the filter located in a hot engine bay. It might get a few more kw's on a dyno since the car's only been running for a few mins but after 30mins of driving I'd like to see how effective it is then.
Lol, back to the old SRI vs CAI who is the undisputed intake champion?
On the defence for SRIs with heatshield and placement, air generally comes from forward motion, flowed from the outside. So how fast the heat from engine transfers to the air is quite negligible. 30 mins of driving would definitely warm / hot up the engine bay. But dont forget, most of the time you will be driving, and so from the looks of the pics, when air goes into the engine bay, it gets sucked by the intake as well, so its not exactly that bad that you will be sucking air from around the heated engine. Not sure if the same logic can apply to "CAI"s when the pipes closed to the engine get so hot that it warms up the air trapped within the pipes itself. Again I think its negligible.
-
Originally Posted by Slow_Dan
Lol, back to the old SRI vs CAI who is the undisputed intake champion?
On the defence for SRIs with heatshield and placement, air generally comes from forward motion, flowed from the outside. So how fast the heat from engine transfers to the air is quite negligible. 30 mins of driving would definitely warm / hot up the engine bay. But dont forget, most of the time you will be driving, and so from the looks of the pics, when air goes into the engine bay, it gets sucked by the intake as well, so its not exactly that bad that you will be sucking air from around the heated engine. Not sure if the same logic can apply to "CAI"s when the pipes closed to the engine get so hot that it warms up the air trapped within the pipes itself. Again I think its negligible.
i have already DIY a shield around the filter Just letting air in from the side where the air is forced up from front grill to under the headlight unit!
-
Originally Posted by LSD GD3
i have already DIY a shield around the filter Just letting air in from the side where the air is forced up from front grill to under the headlight unit!
leo, how you do that?? any pic ?? i want to do that tooo
-
lol.. ok la.. macro defending jazz glory..
say its 60-65 kw atw stock ok? lol.. but CVT jazz still loses more than manual jazz anyway.. but frm ur figures.. Toda Intake(well known in Aus) and Custom catback added 6kw atw... It already proves that the 6.2kw atw gain frm a simota airbox shouldnt be seen as a guide of intake gain in australia.. at least we agree on that..
I would defintely buy that 6.2kw atw simota intake for my gf jazz if thats a geninue aussie dyno approved gain..lol.. till then.. no chance for a SRI as mentioned.. sucking engine bay heat.. in a jazz gaining 6.2kw atw..
JDM Ek4 Squad Perth..
Originally Posted by Chi
Fact is you should get over ur EK4, cos its a POS FWD and its in the worse colour ever released.
Get a real car then start bragging.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Bookmarks