Cam upgarde

[dsp26]

^^for 1.8l benny hell yes... light fly didn't make much diff in my b16 when we put it in.

and i recall in another thread even you said something along the lines of noticability is also dependent available torqu which the 1.6l doesn't have

[blabla]

IMO , if you havent already - put that $1300 into a hd clutch and light flywheel. Also rear swaybar. Much better response to your $$$ input than any cams.

I've got type R clutch and fly in there already and also a sway bar

[bennjamin]

ok disregard my obvious plug.

But really IMO dont even bother with type r cams. Either get serious upper head work or leave it.

[bennjamin]

^^for 1.8l benny hell yes... light fly didn't make much diff in my b16 when we put it in.

and i recall in another thread even you said something along the lines of noticability is also dependent available torqu which the 1.6l doesn't have

you are correct - my point is bang for buck i guess

[blabla]

you are correct - my point is bang for buck i guess

ok and?

Do what?

suggestions?

i even looking at just throwing on jc racing sc and thats $2800

[bennjamin]

work it out on paper...the amount of money spent vs the amount of useable power you get. Turbo is better bang for buck vs SC.

NA work isnt bang for buck. Its a money pit. But you DO know this owning a honda right lol ?

[dsp26]

work it out on paper...the amount of money spent vs the amount of useable power you get. Turbo is better bang for buck vs SC.

NA work isnt bang for buck. Its a money pit. But you DO know this owning a honda right lol ?

quoted for truth!!!

BlaBla - see the link posted in post#2... ask anyone in that thread how much it cost them to get to a certain stage.

excluding my re-rebuild which i'm up for now my head assembly including parts cost around $3k and those parts i managed to source for cheap or 2nd hand on here....

honestly... boost it... you have to be the type to appreciate what little NA power can give you for $$$... my motivation was legality and insurance.

[blabla]

work it out on paper...the amount of money spent vs the amount of useable power you get. Turbo is better bang for buck vs SC.

NA work isnt bang for buck. Its a money pit. But you DO know this owning a honda right lol ?

I know that trying to keep a any sort of car na is Pricey. I dont like the idea of turbo if i was going to go with turbo i would of thrown a turbo onto my old engine D16y8.

Even if i had the choice of worked turbo motor or worked N/A motor i would go for the N/A.

[Benson]

If your going bang for buck, look at bigger displacement.

If i recall right, you have all the parts perfect for a B20vtec or B18c Bottom end upgrade.

Look into Hybrid engines b16a/b20, b16a/b18c

[blabla]

If your going bang for buck, look at bigger displacement.

If i recall right, you have all the parts perfect for a B20vtec or B18c Bottom end upgrade.

Look into Hybrid engines b16a/b20, b16a/b18c

b18c vtir or c7r b20b/a/z?

[blabla]

If i did do that where would i got to get an engineering certificate and they are like 600 bux+

[bennjamin]

get a b18c7 - no need for engineering. and a dead stock setup should pull your car to low 14's if not high 13's. proven.