Which tyre is the most overrated? (Price VS Performance)

[Nepolian]

can anyone elborate on the falken 452's??? how do they perform against the RE-001 or the AD07's?

I have used the AD07 and the RE001 and the RE001 is not in the same league as the Advan in terms of performance. The AD07 are a lot louder though. I very much doubt that the Falken 452 will perform any where near as well as either of the other tyres since the AD07 is considered by most to be a much better performing tyre than Falken's flagship RT615.

If you want performance get the AD07 (or AD08 it's successor), if you want longevity then get the Falken. If you want a balance of the two then get the RE001.

Cant really compare Falken 452's and AD07's now......its like comparing a upspec Hyundai with a Merc or BMW......no in the same league!

Having driven Falkens and RE001 equipped cars (on same type of car) id sat they're comparable. Price wise Falken wins hands down.....just google comparisons

I had AD07's on my other cars and they were awesome!

[jords]

What does everyone think about...


Bridgestone G3's or Kumho kh11 or KU31's or Toyo T1s

Ive got G3's on my car, great tyres, had them 4 years/30000km, still got tread, good in the dry and are great in the wet. I believe they are now discontinued and are superseded by RE001.

[4age8u]

I had re050a on my eg 215/45r17.very grippy and quiet usually used on high end luxury mercs and bmw..350 rip off lol lucky I get em 99each lol.. Re001 over rated