|
-
Yea, I would prefer the CU2 than the civic but only thats missing from the basic model is the fog lights and parking sensors. Besides that, what about changing the lights to xenon. Is it expensive to do so? I assume the bulbs are pretty cheap
-
 Originally Posted by SaintX
Yea, I would prefer the CU2 than the civic but only thats missing from the basic model is the fog lights and parking sensors. Besides that, what about changing the lights to xenon. Is it expensive to do so? I assume the bulbs are pretty cheap
Parking sensors are optional in Civic Sports as well though...

Bye2 Honda... Hello Mazda family 
-
why do u plan on getting the car for only a year but still want so many optional extras that dont make much of a difference except cost u a few grand that will disappear when u sell it?
do u have a car already? id reccommend sticking with it
-
Nope I dont have a car at the moment. I need to have a car for work purposes but most likely I will only be needing it for a year. Civic 2.0, the accord euro CU2 (basic) and now the mazda 3 sp25 is the ones that I am considering. I would much prefer the CU2
-
 Originally Posted by SaintX
Nope I dont have a car at the moment. I need to have a car for work purposes but most likely I will only be needing it for a year. Civic 2.0, the accord euro CU2 (basic) and now the mazda 3 sp25 is the ones that I am considering. I would much prefer the CU2
Mazda 2 SP25 definitely worth considering,you can pick up a demo for under 30K.Id pick this over the Civic sport.2.5ltr.over a 2.0ltr.Sat nav std on Mazda,new model,Civic approx.4 yr.old model.
Last edited by tony1234; 23-02-2010 at 04:35 PM.
-
 Originally Posted by tony1234
Mazda 2 SP25 definitely worth considering,you can pick up a demo for under 30K
Waoooo 2.5L Mazda 2... niceeeeee

Bye2 Honda... Hello Mazda family 
-
 Originally Posted by denot
Waoooo 2.5L Mazda 2... niceeeeee 
Just noticed.Typo.lol at 2.5ltr.Mazda 2
-
Uhhh... You guys meant mazda 3 sp 25 not mazda 2 right?
If its mazda 3 you guys were referring, yea then its worth the price since it comes with a lot of features and not to mention it actually comes with sat nav on board, sounds like a good bargain though.
However, I honestly really love the looks of CU2. Mazda 3 hatchback also looks good but not as classy as the CU2. Damn, spoilt for choice now. Features or looks is more important ? lol
-
 Originally Posted by SaintX
Uhhh... You guys meant mazda 3 sp 25 not mazda 2 right?
If its mazda 3 you guys were referring, yea then its worth the price since it comes with a lot of features and not to mention it actually comes with sat nav on board, sounds like a good bargain though.
However, I honestly really love the looks of CU2. Mazda 3 hatchback also looks good but not as classy as the CU2. Damn, spoilt for choice now. Features or looks is more important ? lol
I was comparing the Mazda 3(sedan) to the civic sport.against the CU2 there is no contest.
-
 Originally Posted by tony1234
I was comparing the Mazda 3(sedan) to the civic sport.against the CU2 there is no contest.
yeah, I agree tony... CU2 is on different level, I think it should be compared to Mazda 6 instead...

Bye2 Honda... Hello Mazda family 
-
 Originally Posted by denot
yeah, I agree tony... CU2 is on different level, I think it should be compared to Mazda 6 instead...
Most car magazines that I have read rated the CU2 higher than the Madza 6 (eg. Wheels AU, Autocar UK, US Consumer). In fact Autocar UK rated the Euro a better drive than the Audi A4.
-
The only difference between the CU2 basic model than the other models are just features right? driving, engine performance are the same between models right?
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Bookmarks