Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 37 to 48 of 80
  1. #37
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ippy
    Car:
    EM1
    lol
    gg pwned
    FOR SALE: Injector seal kits || Dayco B16A timing belt

  2. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeyG View Post
    it was a b20vtec, i did take on turbos. eg 180sx, 200sx, wrx i beat them all i did take on a sti though it snapped me lol but i suggest you staying with your engine and dont street race casue if you do and you will get caught you will lose it big time like myself, 3 years
    Probably not boosted turbo cars.

    No point building N/A cars trying to beat turbos as its just a waste of money in my eyes.

    When the turbo guys spend money on basic mods n up the boost n beat most hondas off the line.

    But i think ek b18 with basic mods n tune should beat a EG with just a b18

  3. #39
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Melb/Syd
    Car:
    CP2 / EG5
    Who cares who beats who, at the end of the day it's just a civic.

  4. #40
    Quote Originally Posted by Tai View Post
    Who cares who beats who, at the end of the day it's just a civic.
    No you are wrong. It's the power of dreams!

  5. #41
    Newcomer Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    rural
    Car:
    91 eh9
    such a broad question to hard to say

  6. #42
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Melb
    Car:
    P1.5 460F/350R
    Quote Originally Posted by NightKids View Post
    No you are wrong. It's the power of dreams!
    It's the power of dreams! It's love!!!!!!!
    S P A M | W O R K S
    With our special rotational tires, it will allow you to drive very fast. - JK Tyre

  7. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by mocchi View Post
    It's the power of dreams! It's love!!!!!!!
    This man. Speaks da truth.

  8. #44
    People asking why bother with a B18 when a B16 can be worked to provide almost as much power, perhaps even more?

    Torque. Pulling power makes all the difference. B18 and B16 with equal mods, B18 will always win because it produces more torque. Doesn't matter if the peak power is the same or not. The larger the capacity of the engine, the more potential it has to produce torque.

    People need to learn the difference between torque and power.

    High power is obtained at high gears. This figure means squat in pulling a car off the line or out of a corner, it is simply a measure of how fast the engine can make the wheels spin. Dyno readings are obtained by spinning a magnet inside a coil and measuring the voltage it produces, it's all about wheel speed.

    Torque is the turning force of the engine, and is greatest in first gear, reducing as the gears go up. It is a measure of how easily the engine can turn the wheels.

    High power, low torque cars are more susceptible to getting bogged down on launches, and their acceleration is much lower.

    Low power, high torque cars have a much lower top speed, but can accelerate much more quickly.

    Big trucks have massive torque, and if you ever watch one take off without a trailer attached, you'll understand what I mean.

    I have a friend that has a V8 with only 270hp at the wheels. My old V8 had 600hp. His torque, on the other hand, was almost 1.5 times mine, and while I could only pull 12's on the strip, he could pull 8's.

    Power is not everything. You need to learn to balance your torque, power, engine response, braking power and turning ability. When you build your car keeping all these things in mind, it will be a weapon. Until then, it will always be just another half-baked ricer.

    So, regarding wanting to beat an EG B18C, good luck. The EG will always have one advantage over you, that's weight. Mod for mod, the EG will always be faster, assuming the drivers are of equal skill. It will corner better, brake better, accelerate better... Having said that, I have no idea of the quality you are hoping to achieve out of your car. If you just want a fast car, whack a turbo on and be done with it. If you want a GOOD car, then sit down and do some research about what makes a well rounded, balanced car, and figure out what you need to do in order to achieve that.

  9. #45
    VOLTEX Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    Bus Route 703
    dont be cheap, do a k series swap and strip the interior

  10. #46
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ippy
    Car:
    EM1
    GenesisEG: well said. People keep forgetting about torque 'cause everyone seems to talk kW/hp. Frustrating! And that's exactly why I lost to a B18. On the Dyno I had slightly more power but on the road he obviously had slightly more torque. If we had a straight track several k's long I probably would have slowly caught back up. Me with the top speed advantage, him with the acceleration advantage.

    So, as I said, boost the b16 for more torque or increase displacement for more torque "Torque wins races"
    FOR SALE: Injector seal kits || Dayco B16A timing belt

  11. #47
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    melb SE suburbs
    Car:
    ek1 mother****er
    Quote Originally Posted by GenesisEG View Post
    People asking why bother with a B18 when a B16 can be worked to provide almost as much power, perhaps even more?

    Torque. Pulling power makes all the difference. B18 and B16 with equal mods, B18 will always win because it produces more torque. Doesn't matter if the peak power is the same or not. The larger the capacity of the engine, the more potential it has to produce torque.

    People need to learn the difference between torque and power.

    High power is obtained at high gears. This figure means squat in pulling a car off the line or out of a corner, it is simply a measure of how fast the engine can make the wheels spin. Dyno readings are obtained by spinning a magnet inside a coil and measuring the voltage it produces, it's all about wheel speed.

    Torque is the turning force of the engine, and is greatest in first gear, reducing as the gears go up. It is a measure of how easily the engine can turn the wheels.

    High power, low torque cars are more susceptible to getting bogged down on launches, and their acceleration is much lower.

    Low power, high torque cars have a much lower top speed, but can accelerate much more quickly.

    Big trucks have massive torque, and if you ever watch one take off without a trailer attached, you'll understand what I mean.

    I have a friend that has a V8 with only 270hp at the wheels. My old V8 had 600hp. His torque, on the other hand, was almost 1.5 times mine, and while I could only pull 12's on the strip, he could pull 8's.

    Power is not everything. You need to learn to balance your torque, power, engine response, braking power and turning ability. When you build your car keeping all these things in mind, it will be a weapon. Until then, it will always be just another half-baked ricer.

    So, regarding wanting to beat an EG B18C, good luck. The EG will always have one advantage over you, that's weight. Mod for mod, the EG will always be faster, assuming the drivers are of equal skill. It will corner better, brake better, accelerate better... Having said that, I have no idea of the quality you are hoping to achieve out of your car. If you just want a fast car, whack a turbo on and be done with it. If you want a GOOD car, then sit down and do some research about what makes a well rounded, balanced car, and figure out what you need to do in order to achieve that.

    one HUUUGE thing your forgetting about. when power/torque figures are quoted theyre exclusively peak power/torque.
    power is produced at every point on the rpm range except for 0rpm.
    and gearing...gearing.

    what your v8 and your mates differed was probably 1. launch traction, 2. torque/power curve, and 3. gearing

    it annoys me when people state that torque is more important then power, cause its not. a low torque high power engine will always out accelerate a high torque low power engine as long as you get the right gearing relevent to the engine. for example. 2 cars, same everything except engine (for the sake of argument same driver too) one engine is more powerfull, the other has slightly more torque (lets assume for the sake of argument that the curve in both engines is relatively flat and the engines have the same gearing) the engine with more torque will accelerate faster off the line, but very quickly will reach redline, where the engine with more power will accelerate through and pass the engine with more torque, as its essentially gear 1 vs 2, with the more powerfull engine always beign in a lower gear longer, and therefore resulting in more torque AT THE WHEELS, despite the actual engine having less torque at the flywheel.
    where this dosent happen (like in that v8 scenario) you have a bad power curve brought on by (im assuming) bad supercharger design/large turbo introducing lots of lag. (i assime you used a charger to make that much power) or other things. this is why all those >1000hp supras cant even run 11's, despite the supra being a barge, the power is totally useless because it dosent come on untill the last 1-500 of your rpm range.
    another example of this is a roots blown pushrod v8 vs a 1000hp supra. the roots blown v8 has lots of usable torque as its POWER is produced throughout the ideal rev range for the v8 compared to the 1000hp supra which produces no power untill the last .5k of the rev range, so effectively, the v8 is running at a HIGHER POWER the majority of the time, with the supra only overtaking the v8 in terms of power production for a fraction of a second before each gear change

    thing is power isnt some abscract figure, physics/engineering guys will agree power is a measure of the energy transferred every second. 1kw is 1000 joules of energy transferred every second. torque is just rotational force, and its very easy for the engine to produce alot of torque and not actually get anywhere fast. eg high torque low power can get to a speed quickly, but that speed is greatly limited by the power of your engine, and its possible to have an engine with lower torque but higher power accelerating much quicker because of gearing. people forget that quoted torque figures are at the fly, not at the wheels.

    thats the thing. torque is just there, whereas power can take advantage of gearing.

    another example b16b produces 160Nm of torque whereas the d16y4 produces 144Nm of torque. given this difference, if you were only looking at torque you would only excpect the b16b to be a small ammount quicker, cause theres only a 14Nm difference in the torque, thats only 8% 'slower'.
    but obviously the b16b is MUCH quicker then this. and that can be seen when you compare the b16b's 136kw to the d16y4's 88kw, which is a whole 35% less power, which sounds more reasonable. this is coupled with the gear box aswell which is suited to the b16b to take advantage of this extra power.
    infact, the b16a1 has the same quoted torque figure as the d16y4, but its much faster. if torque was much more important then power you'd see the b16a1 only narrowly beating a d16y4, but obviously that is absurd.

    "Low power, high torque cars have a much lower top speed, but can accelerate much more quickly."
    if your low power high torque car can accelerate faster then your low torque high power car, you have a serious problem either in your power curve, or your gearing

    im not saying torque is not important at all, cause it clearly is and you have to carefully look at where the torque is produced in the rpm range based on application and where you are going to use it. i have just assumed a straight drag scenario. but power IS more important then torque.




    also, if torque won races, you'd see alot more diesels in motorsport
    Last edited by redefine; 30-03-2010 at 01:26 PM.
    THAT SHIT WAS BANANAS

  12. #48
    one HUUUGE thing your forgetting about. when power/torque figures are quoted theyre exclusively peak power/torque.
    power is produced at every point on the rpm range except for 0rpm.
    and gearing...gearing.
    True, but I think you'll find that in every post I've made on this forum, I've supported N/A cars purely for the fact that generally speaking, their power curve is far more predictable and far more linear than that of boosted cars (I say in general, I know it's possible to achieve a similar result using boost but it's far more expensive).

    what your v8 and your mates differed was probably 1. launch traction, 2. torque/power curve, and 3. gearing
    Same gearing, he had slightly better traction but not enough to make 4 seconds difference... It was the torque that made the difference.

    it annoys me when people state that torque is more important then power, cause its not.
    I don't think I ever said that one is more important than the other. In fact, I'm quite sure I never said it.

    What I did say, was that people pay far too much attention to getting massive power output without considering their torque output. People keep talking about modding 1.6L engines and making them more powerful than 1.8L engines, and that may be so, but there is a reason the 1.8L is better, and that's torque. Assuming the peak power of the engine is the same, the engine with more torque wins, hands down.

    Anyone who has ever raced on a track, or anywhere for that matter, knows that being able to drive at 400kph doesn't mean alot when you're facing corners. The car that launches faster and can handle corners faster, will always come out on top, and I've proven that in practice. My 600hp ute can quite comfortably sit on 330kph (I've done it before), but it gets eaten alive by anything with decent torque and the ability to handle corners.

    a low torque high power engine will always out accelerate a high torque low power engine as long as you get the right gearing relevent to the engine. for example. 2 cars, same everything except engine (for the sake of argument same driver too) one engine is more powerfull, the other has slightly more torque (lets assume for the sake of argument that the curve in both engines is relatively flat and the engines have the same gearing) the engine with more torque will accelerate faster off the line, but very quickly will reach redline, where the engine with more power will accelerate through and pass the engine with more torque, as its essentially gear 1 vs 2, with the more powerfull engine always beign in a lower gear longer, and therefore resulting in more torque AT THE WHEELS, despite the actual engine having less torque at the flywheel.
    Lower torque at the engine, higher torque at the wheels... I'm confused. Torque is not produced at the wheels, it's the ability of the engine to make the wheels turn under load. More torque means faster acceleration, because the engine can make the wheels turn more easily under load. It doesn't matter if you have a million horsepower, if your torque is low, you will never be able to make the mass of the car move forward.

    That's why high powered 4 cylinder cars lose alot of their driving potential when they have 4 people sitting in them, whereas an 8 cylinder engine with much more torque can move that extra mass with relative ease.

    Having said that, I repeat, I never said that power is unimportant, it's just not as important as people think. In real-life driving, meaning driving on roads with corners and the need to stop and start from time to time, torque becomes a major factor in performance. If you were doing laps around a ring, then it becomes less important and peak power comes into play, since you're moving around in top gear for long periods of time. Lets assume, for the sake of being realistic, that this doesn't happen often...

    As you say, gearing is important, but again, we're not talking so much about gearing as we are about engines. The question was, why use a B18 when a B16 can produce as much, if not more horsepower. The answer is torque. If you modify a B16 and a B18 so that both produce 200hp at the engine, the B18 will always win, always, because it has more torque.

    where this dosent happen (like in that v8 scenario) you have a bad power curve brought on by (im assuming) bad supercharger design/large turbo introducing lots of lag. (i assime you used a charger to make that much power) or other things.
    No, purely N/A, with shortened gear ratios. I spent alot of money making my car very powerful, before I fully realised what I was doing.

    Anyway, even a large turbo on a 5.7L V8 has very little lag, as the exhaust output is massive even at idle. I was quoted for a T1000 turbo with an expected power output of 1700rwhp, 80% boost at 1800rpm. No lag there.

    this is why all those >1000hp supras cant even run 11's, despite the supra being a barge, the power is totally useless because it dosent come on untill the last 1-500 of your rpm range.
    another example of this is a roots blown pushrod v8 vs a 1000hp supra. the roots blown v8 has lots of usable torque as its POWER is produced throughout the ideal rev range for the v8 compared to the 1000hp supra which produces no power untill the last .5k of the rev range, so effectively, the v8 is running at a HIGHER POWER the majority of the time, with the supra only overtaking the v8 in terms of power production for a fraction of a second before each gear change
    Which is why I always advise against sticking a turbo on a Civic. The power band is too narrow, and the power curve is too sharp, and it makes for a really difficult time driving on anything but a straight road.

    thing is power isnt some abscract figure, physics/engineering guys will agree power is a measure of the energy transferred every second. 1kw is 1000 joules of energy transferred every second. torque is just rotational force, and its very easy for the engine to produce alot of torque and not actually get anywhere fast. eg high torque low power can get to a speed quickly, but that speed is greatly limited by the power of your engine, and its possible to have an engine with lower torque but higher power accelerating much quicker because of gearing. people forget that quoted torque figures are at the fly, not at the wheels.
    True, a car with a million Nm of torque and no power will not move very fast at all, but now you're talking extremes. A car with a million horsepower and no torque will not be able to move off the line to begin with, even if it could travel at the speed of light once it got moving.

    thats the thing. torque is just there, whereas power can take advantage of gearing.
    True, torque is torque and it's hard to increase the torque output of an engine without increasing its capacity, which is why the B18 is superior to the B16, again.

    The B18 can produce just as much power as the B16, but on top of that, it produces more torque, which will result in quicker acceleration throughout the entire rev range.

    another example b16b produces 160Nm of torque whereas the d16y4 produces 144Nm of torque. given this difference, if you were only looking at torque you would only excpect the b16b to be a small ammount quicker, cause theres only a 14Nm difference in the torque, thats only 8% 'slower'.
    but obviously the b16b is MUCH quicker then this. and that can be seen when you compare the b16b's 136kw to the d16y4's 88kw, which is a whole 35% less power, which sounds more reasonable. this is coupled with the gear box aswell which is suited to the b16b to take advantage of this extra power.
    infact, the b16a1 has the same quoted torque figure as the d16y4, but its much faster. if torque was much more important then power you'd see the b16a1 only narrowly beating a d16y4, but obviously that is absurd.
    Again, I NEVER said that power was unimportant. Please read my post very carefully, because I'm SURE that I never said it.

    if your low power high torque car can accelerate faster then your low torque high power car, you have a serious problem either in your power curve, or your gearing
    ...or torque plays a bigger role than you seem to believe.

    im not saying torque is not important at all, cause it clearly is and you have to carefully look at where the torque is produced in the rpm range based on application and where you are going to use it. i have just assumed a straight drag scenario. but power IS more important then torque.
    I never assume straight drag scenarios, because drag cars are absolutely useless everywhere else. Plus, Civics are a really bad choice for drag cars since they are both underpowered and front wheel drive. In a drag, you want big power, big torque and the wheels being driven by the engine to actually be touching the ground when you accelerate... Rear wheel drive cars press their drive wheels into the ground under acceleration which is why they will always be superior to front wheel drive cars in drags.

    Not only that, but drags really don't interest me. To me, driving skill is all about balance. Acceleration, braking and cornering. Drag racers only have to master one, track and mountain racers have to master all three.

    also, if torque won races, you'd see alot more diesels in motorsport
    There are some diesels in motorsport, but diesel engines are not as widely used by the general populace at the moment, and the engines themselves are not as highly developed. I think, given time, you will see more diesel engines hit the tracks. It's just going to take time before people start looking for ways to utilise the torque they can produce without sacrificing too much power.

    I apologise for any harshness in my tone, I just got home from a 16 hour day at work and I'm a bit tired. I'm really just over this misconception that big power figures are the be-all and end-all of performance. Balance is where it's at, and a balanced car will ALWAYS beat an unbalanced, high-powered car in any situation except for a long, long straight.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.