Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678
Results 85 to 96 of 96

Thread: Petrol

  1. #85
    Newcomer Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Car:
    FD Civic VTI-LE
    Quote Originally Posted by FDBenni View Post
    yes..
    Quote Originally Posted by jyh888 View Post
    Does your car consume more fuel when it runs rich??
    Quote Originally Posted by jyh888 View Post
    I just don't quite understand this concept, often when we modify our intake for example, the air fuel ratio will be rich but we read a lower fuel consumption...any reasons?
    Quote Originally Posted by curtis265 View Post
    What's more easier - sucking in air through a lollipop stick, or sucking throgh a straw?

    The engine's not working as hard to make the power for u to accelerate at a given rate, so it'll use less fuel. if that makes any sense LOL
    I think this needs a bit more explanation.

    When a car runs "Rich" it means that the air fuel mixture is a bit heavier on the fuel side, "usually" because there is a technical fault with the engine eg:- blocked jet/injector, air filter is clogged, air sensor is reading wrong etc......

    When you modify the air intake to allow faster airflow, forced air induction etc.. this doesn't make the car run rich as such, but it does pump more fuel in but the actual mixture will be as it is intended. As mentioned above, the easier it is for the car to breathe (get fuel and air into the cylinder) the easier it is to rev eg:- more power less effort. If you are serious about this, then modifying the intake without looking at how the gasses are going to escape eg:- exhaust, then probably not worth the effort unless you plan to do the exhaust when you have the cash.

  2. #86
    Newcomer Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Manning
    Car:
    onevia13, CTR10
    Quote Originally Posted by Nairda View Post
    Not necessarily...quality of the fuel depends on the content of hydrocarbons inside the solution and impurities...

    Let me educate you a little since im studying organic chemistry =P

    Octane content is important because it gives off a good amount of energy when you burn it and it forms CO2 and H2O being more stable than a long hydrocarbon chain. According to wikipedia it gives off standard enthalpy of −5430 kJ/mol in combustion. (Enthalpy = the change in energy when a reaction occurs. "-" means exothermic reaction and energy is given off, positive integers means endothermic and energy is absorbed)

    Fuels that dont have as much of these nice long chains (Octane +) and have more Ethanol (E10) and thus do not give as high energy when burnt. Wikipedia suggests that Ethanol's standard enthalpy for combustion –1370.7 kJ/mol.

    So from these figures you can see that 1 mol of octane gives off more energy when combusted (which is expected because octane has more carbons and more hydrogens, as well as one mol of octane is heavier than ethanol). However as it turns out i just worked out the Molar Mass of ethanol which is 46 and octane is 114.. so actually in octane you are getting 2x the amount of energy per mol combusted even when you get near equal mass amounts

    Also quality of fuel takes into account less impurities such as sulfates that are usually found inside crude oil so when you talk about "Good quality fuel" such as VPower and Ultimate, they have less impurities because they have been processed that much more (more filtration, purer fractional distillation)

    Therefore the "purer" the fuel, the more energy you actually obtain from the combustion because theres more hydrocarbons per drop....less impurities such as sulfates that dont give off a lot of energy when combusted. Pure ethanol also vaporises quite quickly so you may actually "lose" a little in the combustion process. (which is the fuel smell when you open your filler cap...some fuel has vaporised)

    Thus in comparison your engine works like this:
    I need X amount of energy to accelerate from 0 - 80km/h and with fuel with no ethanol it takes "O" amount
    the same X energy for acceleration from 0 - 80km/h requires "E" amount from E10 which is a x% more than the amount "O"

    So every time your car needs to get up the same hill, will need to use that much x% more E10 than O

    I hope this deserves a PQ point =)
    I see what your saying in regards to the comment, about the BP ultimate eating more fuel- i agree that its not entirely true, yes it may cost more than the lower grade fuels, but thats just because like you said, the purity of the 98 octane, my understanding of organic chem is that yes a more pure form of a substance/ molecule means less impurities, so that the engine should be burning the fuel more efficiently and also providing more power in each reaction/ products produced, instead of different compounds (higher concentrations of them/more) making up the ultimate mix, meaning that because it's not as pure the reaction rate for each product in the fuelis different, which i assume leads more residue forming/ left (as seen as black smoke/ carbon by most)and not efficient energy production as the engine is trying to get through more compounds than it is built to by the manufacturers (so lower grade fuels may just mean burns off faster if its a low molecular wt), so yeah higher grade petrol=higher concentrations = costs more (what did you expect for more of something), the price you have to pay for better performing cars.

  3. #87
    Quote Originally Posted by onevia13 View Post
    I see what your saying in regards to the comment, about the BP ultimate eating more fuel- i agree that its not entirely true, yes it may cost more than the lower grade fuels, but thats just because like you said, the purity of the 98 octane, my understanding of organic chem is that yes a more pure form of a substance/ molecule means less impurities, so that the engine should be burning the fuel more efficiently and also providing more power in each reaction/ products produced, instead of different compounds (higher concentrations of them/more) making up the ultimate mix, meaning that because it's not as pure the reaction rate for each product in the fuelis different, which i assume leads more residue forming/ left (as seen as black smoke/ carbon by most)and not efficient energy production as the engine is trying to get through more compounds than it is built to by the manufacturers (so lower grade fuels may just mean burns off faster if its a low molecular wt), so yeah higher grade petrol=higher concentrations = costs more (what did you expect for more of something), the price you have to pay for better performing cars.
    Good point there. I also believe that the better grade petrol you use for your car, the longer the engine will go and will generate less problems in the long run rather than using cheap petrol. Sort of like giving a human cheap food vs good quality food, the good quality is gonna satisfy and going to be better in the running. I just think of the car as a human :P

  4. #88
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Perth
    Car:
    FN2R
    after installing the raizin and driving around for a bit.......
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0754..jpg 
Views:	88 
Size:	131.2 KB 
ID:	15685  
    n3rb-alicious !

  5. #89
    Quote Originally Posted by br3nny View Post
    after installing the raizin and driving around for a bit.......
    Wow dude, 7.9/100km is efficient as a nut!!!

  6. #90
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    head ache
    Car:
    CL9
    im only using 95 or 98. 98 all the time if i can. i find the car revs and drives smother. better for the engine too so f it.
    wake up and take some sleeping tablets.

  7. #91
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    835 Beaufort St
    Car:
    hondie 2000
    Quote Originally Posted by br3nny View Post
    after installing the raizin and driving around for a bit.......
    What kind of driving do you do? This is better than my 'fuel efficient' engine

  8. #92
    Quote Originally Posted by curtis265 View Post
    What kind of driving do you do? This is better than my 'fuel efficient' engine
    hahahah, thats for me as well ><

  9. #93
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Perth
    Car:
    FN2R
    Quote Originally Posted by curtis265 View Post
    What kind of driving do you do? This is better than my 'fuel efficient' engine
    Quote Originally Posted by ekay1 View Post
    hahahah, thats for me as well ><
    this was after a week after having the raizin installed

    i reset the meter at the beginning of the weekend, normal drive around with vtec on the on ramp of the freeway i guess i was being mindful at the time watching the fuel gauge as i was driving around but...its crept up to 8.1 now tho after 300kms =(

    still running rich atm so i don't know if i'm really using that amount of fuel haha....love the burble but in a couple of months till flashpro so hopefully that brings or keeps it more stable after!!!!
    n3rb-alicious !

  10. #94
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Car:
    Accord Euro CU2
    just calculated my fuel effciecy: 8.4l/100km for only city drive. (42L/495km refuel right after the last bar off)
    Pivot Spark Earth installed.
    Last edited by tinymoon; 19-08-2010 at 05:37 PM.

  11. #95
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    835 Beaufort St
    Car:
    hondie 2000
    wats that?

  12. #96

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.