Page 18 of 30 FirstFirst ... 81516171819202128 ... LastLast
Results 205 to 216 of 355
  1. #205
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, West
    Car:
    EP3
    Still cant believe your switching from injen and skunk2 just to be 'JDM'.

  2. #206
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    Accord Euro 03
    What ems will you be getting.

  3. #207
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melb
    Car:
    '03 Euro [CL9]
    Quote Originally Posted by MingZai View Post
    Whoever said the J's Racing was louder then the Skunk 2 you are very very wrong LOL.
    Why should I be bragging about it ,
    Quiet ay? Just what header cat are you currently running with the catback?
    2003 CL9 5AT *ECU REFLASHED*
    CT-E Icebox|Ralco RZ pulleys|K&N filter|DC Header|250cell Cat|Cusco Tower & H Brace| H.Drive Coilovers | Rays RE30 18x8.5 | S/S Brakelines | Rigid Collars

  4. #208
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    04 CL9, 11 323i
    Quote Originally Posted by marquee View Post
    I meant to say shouldn't... But least you diy
    haha never was :P but yeah least I DIY which I'm happy I did

    Quote Originally Posted by Symphorced View Post
    Still cant believe your switching from injen and skunk2 just to be 'JDM'.
    Well that's where my build is going and + I get more gains from the 'JDM' products...
    Injen is a good intake but it's tubing is quite long and there's always the really really minor possibility of hydrolocking (which will never happen in Australia if you know what your doing :P)
    My J's Racing Exhaust weighs ~5KG and is a single exhaust. So I'm getting a lot more than just to be 'JDM' as I'm building a performance build / JDM build.

    Quote Originally Posted by marquee View Post
    What ems will you be getting.
    Probably Flash Pro once I have the funds...

    Quote Originally Posted by Fredoops View Post
    Quiet ay? Just what header cat are you currently running with the catback?
    It's not that quiet but much much more quiet compared to the Skunk 2.

    Let's just say I won't be setting anymore car alarms off anymore haha!

    Same setup as previous...
    Weapon R + Hi Flow CAT

  5. #209
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    Accord Euro 03
    Im not saying its not a good build or not but a manual car would with an injen skunk2 would quicker then yours.

  6. #210
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    04 CL9, 11 323i
    Quote Originally Posted by marquee View Post
    Im not saying its not a good build or not but a manual car would with an injen skunk2 would quicker then yours.
    Don't know if I'm reading right but I'm guessing your saying what I had previously was a better setup in comparison to now?
    If so that doesn't even make any sense for a few reasons.
    1. My car is lighter by approx 15 kgs.
    2. Its a single exhaust.
    3. Intake is essentially a CAI with a shorter tube thus faster response.

  7. #211
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melb
    Car:
    '03 Euro [CL9]
    Hmmm... Arent J's carbon fibre parts made in China?
    2003 CL9 5AT *ECU REFLASHED*
    CT-E Icebox|Ralco RZ pulleys|K&N filter|DC Header|250cell Cat|Cusco Tower & H Brace| H.Drive Coilovers | Rays RE30 18x8.5 | S/S Brakelines | Rigid Collars

  8. #212
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    05 EURO CL9
    Quote Originally Posted by marquee View Post
    Im not saying its not a good build or not but a manual car would with an injen skunk2 would quicker then yours.
    You speak the truth.
    OH WERD?!!

  9. #213
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    Accord Euro 03
    Quote Originally Posted by MingZai View Post
    Don't know if I'm reading right but I'm guessing your saying what I had previously was a better setup in comparison to now?
    If so that doesn't even make any sense for a few reasons.
    1. My car is lighter by approx 15 kgs.
    2. Its a single exhaust.
    3. Intake is essentially a CAI with a shorter tube thus faster response.
    No im saying you need a good base ie manual

  10. #214
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melb
    Car:
    '03 Euro [CL9]
    There's plenty of supercharged auto TSx's out there.

    Each to their own.

    Ming would have the only auto J's build in the world.
    2003 CL9 5AT *ECU REFLASHED*
    CT-E Icebox|Ralco RZ pulleys|K&N filter|DC Header|250cell Cat|Cusco Tower & H Brace| H.Drive Coilovers | Rays RE30 18x8.5 | S/S Brakelines | Rigid Collars

  11. #215
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, West
    Car:
    EP3
    Quote Originally Posted by Fredoops View Post
    Ming would have the only auto J's build in the world.
    Something to be proud of.

    Mingzai, you still thinking about doing your manual conversion? As you're talking about weight reduction, more power gains ect. I would've thought that you would have spent the money on the manual conversion first.

  12. #216
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melb
    Car:
    '03 Euro [CL9]
    Lol..... You lot remind me of a thread on GTi forums....
    Except the op got ridiculued for having a manual over the DSG.
    2003 CL9 5AT *ECU REFLASHED*
    CT-E Icebox|Ralco RZ pulleys|K&N filter|DC Header|250cell Cat|Cusco Tower & H Brace| H.Drive Coilovers | Rays RE30 18x8.5 | S/S Brakelines | Rigid Collars

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.