I've hit the point where I cannot be bothered anymore lol.

As you've admitted that you do not care about legality, practicality or economic ramifications, which basically all of your "idealistic" view would have to cover before it can be implemented. Most of your responses have such a low probability of occurrence it is statistically irrelevant. Again, as you don't care about it, you will refuse to accept any my statistical evidence.

I can sit here, provide you statistics and the written law, however as mentioned all of the above means "nothing to you". That is your belief and I can accept that, I'm not here to change your views, just seeking your justification for the change in law and how you expect to apply it. For the records, I still cannot see how this would work, I don't think it's a bad idea, just that there is no practical way of implementing it unless you can prove otherwise.

On a few side notes.

ADR Compliance - You can engineer your car if you wish to have modifications on it.
Cars without electronic aids - How many people are actually going to purchase it? If given a choice I'm sure most people if not all people would opt for the aids.
Carrying a knife - You can carry a knife from point A to point B, the law stipulates that it is an controlled weapon, if the knife is not deemed to be a controlled weapon or the object intent is not for bodily harm, it is not illegal. Example would be carrying a swiss army knife, until the point you decide to shank someone, they cannot prosecute you for it.

As for your insatiable desire to live and do what you want, have you ever considered moving to New Zealand? They have very relaxed vehicle laws there, seems to be your haven.