| 
				
	 
		
		
	 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
			
- 
	
	
		
		
			
				
				
						
						
				
					
						
							Edit: I swear i tried to keep this short, bt it seems i cant do it. Mcfail. 
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  fillit
					 
				 
				I've hit the point where I cannot be bothered anymore lol. 
 
As you've admitted that you do not care about legality, practicality or economic ramifications, which basically all of your "idealistic" view would have to cover before it can be implemented. Most of your responses have such a low probability of occurrence it is statistically irrelevant. Again, as you don't care about it, you will refuse to accept any my statistical evidence. 
			
		 
	 
 I dont care much with the current laws (not legality on the whole). Most of my responses may have incredibly low stat's but are based on experience and frustrations that came from them lol. I dont like when a law is 'good enough' because is covers 99% of cases. If it doesnt cover 100%, it cannot be a law (Personal definition of what defines a 'real' law). Luckily for a lot of people, i cant be bothered trying to change the system and can only be bothered trying to explain my viewpoint to people in the hopes they do something :P 
 
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  fillit
					 
				 
				I can sit here, provide you statistics and the written law, however as mentioned all of the above means "nothing to you". That is your belief and I can accept that, I'm not here to change your views, just seeking your justification for the change in law and how you expect to apply it. For the records, I still cannot see how this would work, I don't think it's a bad idea, just that there is no practical way of implementing it unless you can prove otherwise. 
			
		 
	 
 If this is regarding 'high power viehlce registration', i would take the current system for heavy vehicles (they need to get weighed / certififed / ect) and simply apply the same thing to any vehicle with 150+kw/t (pulled the figure out of a hat). If a car is standard no test needed, if the car is modified, you need to provide details. Once a person has got the the license, i would hope they keep the prices for normal cars vs high power cars the same and thus there is no real reason not to rego it as a high power vehicle... ect. Trust me, that part of it would work and actually not be tooooo difficult to implement.  
 
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  fillit
					 
				 
				ADR Compliance - You can engineer your car if you wish to have modifications on it. 
			
		 
	 
 I know this is meant to be a thread for NSW, but i have NFI what sort of regs you got there. In vic, this is not possible. I can get / have gotten defected for something an engineer has signed off on.  
 
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  fillit
					 
				 
				Cars without electronic aids - How many people are actually going to purchase it? If given a choice I'm sure most people if not all people would opt for the aids. 
			
		 
	 
 Anyone that plans to modify the vehicle extensively   
As i said, i doubt any manufacturers would make such a car, but i want the ability to get rid of said safety systems legally.  
At present, most people who modify the cars extensively replace the ECU and also get rid of many of the 'safety' electronics... Even if you are able to provide some form of comparable function, that would count as a modification to a safety system which is illegal and thus 99% of newer cars that are modified to that point are illegal no matter what you do. There is no way to certify such modifications. 
 
99% of the population wouldnt be effected at all, me included as i dont like new cars, but i hate the fact there is no process or possibility of complying to the law while modifying a car extensively. 
 
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  fillit
					 
				 
				Carrying a knife - You can carry a knife from point A to point B, the law stipulates that it is an controlled weapon, if the knife is not deemed to be a controlled weapon or the object intent is not for bodily harm, it is not illegal. Example would be carrying a swiss army knife, until the point you decide to shank someone, they cannot prosecute you for it. 
			
		 
	 
 So simply because a car is able to kill someone and statistically (assumption) it is more likely to do so if the vehicle has lots of power and is drven by a youth; A youth driving a powerful shows intent to hurt? Bit iffy but comes back to my stubborn belief that supporting laws are retarded lol.   
 
	
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by  fillit
					 
				 
				As for your insatiable desire to live and do what you want, have you ever considered moving to New Zealand? They have very relaxed vehicle laws there, seems to be your haven. 
			
		 
	 
 Vehicle laws are petty things imo, not going to change where i live based on that. ATM Its aus or canada based on all the other laws. Unfortunately both are slowly turing into america and am considering going to a non-developed nation but am kinda comfortable here with my decent paycheck, stable job and lack of fear of getting shanked walking down the street...  
						 
					 
					
				 
			 
			
			
		 
	 
		
	 
 
 
		 
		
		
	
 
	
	
 
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
		
		
		
		
			
				 
				Posting Permissions
			
			
				
	
		- You may not post new threads
 
		- You may not post replies
 
		- You may not post attachments
 
		- You may not edit your posts
 
		-  
 
	 
	
	Forum Rules 
 
			 
		 
	 
 
			 | 
		
		
	
Bookmarks