Because the RBB manifold is actually a very well-designed and well-suited part to the Euro's characteristics. It is designed for mid-range torque and when people say "it sacrafices top end" for that, it doesn't, because they're speaking about builds where they plan to rev to 8000rpm+ (way out of the RBB's league). The RBB is almost perfectly suited to the Euro's redline, VTC gears and hunger for air, as Chris F has proven that with a bored RBB and bigger throttle body you can make huge mid-range gains and hold good peak power for a while.
The only place you'll lose power with an RBB compared to an RBC is in the early revs up to about 3800rpm and after about 6500rpm. That 2700rpm chunk in the middle is the most important of the whole rev range, though, so the benefit is gone.
This is of course with the standard ECU with its standard VTC settings, because that too has been set up for the RBB's longer runners. I have confidence that with stand alone tuning (the ability to do VTC) and increase the redline the RBC could be as good-a-performer as the RBB with stock cams, but with the ability to rev higher (assuming the cams and valvetrain could).
I speak from experience though as I've done every bolt on and the RBC, including a header and exhaust with more flow than most being run on Euros and a larger TB.
At the end of the day though, the RBC (and the similiar RRC) are very, very good parts. I mean Honda wouldn't put them on the Type Rs if they weren't. But you can't bolt a part from a completely different engine such as the K20A onto a K24 and expect its stock tuning, cams, VTC etc. to take kindly to it.
/endbitchsession
Bookmarks