Opinions on the CRX??

**mini_s2000** · 11-10-2005 05:56 PM

they are a great balanced car!

**Snoop_gee** · 16-10-2005 02:05 AM

hey JasonGilholme welcome to OH, the fact u actually have a taste in CRX well done! Your unique and different from the rest thats wat also owning a CRX is all about.
I love crx's from the day 1. My first car was a gen1 CRX and now my second car is currently a gen2 crx. Thou who knows what might be my third car? A gen3 crx heheh

just have to wait and see.
The apple doesn't fall far from the tree in the way that gen1 crx's and gen2 crx's are shaped and with gen3 i got no clue wat they were thinking.

yeh i would choose then gen3 (for its age as someone has already mentioned) but then again the gen3 was the sole reason why the CRX production was stopped. :P

yeah i reackon gen3 ruined it for CRX in general full stop. But never give up on wat u like man. Thats how its been for me and i loved CRX so much it didn't matter if my nissan friends said it's S*#@ cause quietly i think they can suffer in their jocks now that petrol prices are high. Which mean in return more money in my back pocket to do mods(modifications) and less on fuel compared to the boost commowhores(commodores).. point being is if u like the gen3 crx go for it.Read my story http://www.ozhonda.com/forum/showthr...2&page=7&pp=12

And as u say u can turn heads in a crx EXCON1 gen3 showcar @ autosalon

Or even rip it up 400kw's by our very own JAMES in the BLKCRX @ autosalon dyno its all a matter of how much amount of money u have...

Join us @ www.crxaus.com for more info in terms specially for CRX's in Australia.

**Setanta** · 16-10-2005 11:22 AM

Gen 2 = the prettiest Honda ever, excluding the S500/S600/S800. Gen 1s look damn nice too - a touch more aggressive if you can find an Si import.

Gen 3s are girly cars - up there with Celicas in the hairdresser stakes. Just because they have a B16A doesn't make them great - IMO they are a step backwards in evolution - get an EG Civic instead. Honda should be bitchslapped for the gayness that is the 3G CRX.

Personally, I'd have an order of preference as follows:

JDM EF8 SiR (Gen 2) glasstop CRX, Gen 2 SiR, Aussie spec ED9. JDM AT Si (Gen 1). EG Civic....

.... put on a dress and call myself Nancy and then cut my wrists for even considering a 3G Del Slow.

*Puts on flame retardent gear*

**Setanta** · 16-10-2005 11:29 AM

Originally Posted by saxman

is there a honda that isn't?

NSX
S2000
MDX
EF/EG SiR Civic/CRX
ITR
CTR (EK onwards)
AT Si Civic/CRX
City Turbo 2
S800 (for its era)
Gen 1 Civic RS1200 (for its era)

All have excellent power to weight ratios.

I left out the EK SiR/VTiR and Del Slow as well as the EM1 - as they are pretty hefty beasts in terms of weight.

I think you might need to actually research before showing your nubness

**lazymofo** · 16-10-2005 02:09 PM

honda is the shitzzznit!

**Setanta** · 16-10-2005 03:22 PM

Honda sucks. It was once great, now it's a bland, insipid car maker.

They need a kick in the arse.

**civicdacbiet** · 19-10-2005 07:36 PM

Both tegs (esp with front conversion) and 3g crx/sol get my votes in looks department. Wicked cars, except crx has 2 seats only, not functional enough for me. Luv it all the same, it's human nature to want something u cant have... bitch.

Any car will turn heads if u are willing to spend the money on it, so get something u truly like, not just for the image (although u should consider it). I say make a very informed decision, and i mean very very informed!!! (more reading 4 u). If u get something based on others opinions alone, chances are u'll get bored of it and it'll end up in the 4 sales section. Waste of time and money if u ask me.