-
Dunno bout the Hatch backs, but ive read in differents mags and the EM1 coupe is around 7.6-7.8 sec.
I gtech my EM1 when it was dead stock and got a best of 7.11 sec but averaged around the 7.4s..but this is not always accurate way of testing imo..
-
I was equipped by Mugen
Array
haha this old thread again
Wheels magazine quote 8.2.
Ive tested my VTiR when it was stock and got 7.8 on about 15 runs and a best of 7.5 on one run. I experimented leaving it in second and tried shifting to third on some runs.
The EK9 is supposed to do it in 6.9 ~ depending also upon which Best Motoring DVD you watch but from all real life sources, 6.9 - 7.2 are the figure thrown at me.
more in this website:
http://www.dohc-vtec.com.au/pages/li...r-vs-typer.htm
Honda resource for enthusiasts with all the latest news from Honda, downloads, media, photo albums, technical information and lots more!
-
nrma is way off on heaps of honda stats... redbook isnt that crash hot either
before i got my em1 i read that they did 8.7, 8, 7.8secs... and first time i did 0-100km i smashd all them times...
my em1 times are similar to trust-me... so the hatch should be around the same...
guesstimating a CTR should get a solid 6.5secs... i think there jst a little bit slower the a dc2r
-
I was equipped by Mugen
Array
Actually all reports have indicated the EK9 is faster than the DC2 ITR. This was also backed up by someone who has raced both and runs a tuning business in Singapore. But ironically is franctionally slower over the 1/4
Honda resource for enthusiasts with all the latest news from Honda, downloads, media, photo albums, technical information and lots more!
-
from what ive seen
its 8.1
but dats the claimed one
i reckon they can go faster
EK4 SiR
1:16.3 @wakfield
1:58.9 @ eastern creek
-
Trust-Me: Did you include the weight of petrol in your tank(approximately 1kg/Litre) and your body weight when you input the weight figure into your g-tech for the 0-100km/h runs? 7.11sec sounds quick for a EM1/or EK4.
Doesn't a stock DC2R/DC5R do 0-100km/h in around 6.9sec 7secs flat?
Vti-r Civic/Integras Mid to High 7s (Teg's quicker tho)
Vti-r Preludes around 8 to 8.5sec
my 2cents (i could be totally wrong, it just my opinion based on what i've read in the past)
-
Originally Posted by Civic Type R
Actually all reports have indicated the EK9 is faster than the DC2 ITR. This was also backed up by someone who has raced both and runs a tuning business in Singapore. But ironically is franctionally slower over the 1/4
There's a video clip with the DC2R Vs the EK9...
and the DC2R beat it 0 - 100 and down the quarter.
This was tested by those jap drivers...
-
yeah i saw that it was from a best motoring Vid.
I think it depends on which DC2R your talking about, the DC2R they are talking about is prob a Aus spec one.
I think the JDM ITR is quicker, but on the track apparently the CTR is quicker around the corners. I saw it on the Type R best motoring DVD which i have around here somewhere.
Evo IX - THE FINAL EVOLUTION
-
i thought the TEggy was quicker around track.
i have a clip with the teggy Vs the Civic type R of course around a track in japan. the civic was alittle slower.
to you
OzHONDA FTL
-
I was equipped by Mugen
Array
Mind you a lot of those BM vids are bias.
Ive got a big collection of them and a lot of the times differ as per car they're comparing it against
Honda resource for enthusiasts with all the latest news from Honda, downloads, media, photo albums, technical information and lots more!
-
Honda Test Info for 0-100, 1400m etc are all with full tank of petrol as far as I know.
plus, u have to wonder for all the factory claimed 0-100 and 1400m tests, are they doing tyre-baking launches, flat shifting, kissing the rev-limiter etc.. plus the tests are performed many, many times and averaged out to a median.
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
Bookmarks