Page 7 of 15 FirstFirst ... 45678910 ... LastLast
Results 73 to 84 of 175

Thread: h22a vs wrx

  1. #73
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Adelaide
    Car:
    happy car
    LOL.l google.com.au is my friend use it and find out o-100 times. 1/4 times there we go. use a Prelude h22a if u cant find any times . or better yet. check out the timeslips here.. then look on wrx australia LOL

  2. #74
    Account Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Pariaman, Indonesia
    Car:
    Mitsubishi Colt TME
    H22A prelude is same speed as B18C2 VTi-R Teg.

    VTi-R teg is slower than WRX.

  3. #75
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Car:
    EF8 CRX
    Mate as much as i love hondas i would guarantee that a wrx will beat an accord or prelude with a h22a if both cars are stock. Other than the very first shape 94' model, there is little lag to speak of and a flat broad and bloody big torque curve. A wrx would beat the accord just as easily in roll on as it would from a standing start. If you picked 50increments to do the rollon from and to you would be lucky to find one that the accord will win. I have seen many rollon tests in magazines and 3rd 4th and 5th gear any rex in the last 8years would have no trouble beating a prelude at all. There have been reviews with the prelude vtir vs rex vs 200sx and the prelude was beaten easily by the turboed cars. Also reviews with wrx and type r integra show the wrx win every time (and before the arguments of torque advantages of the h22a, the gearing of the type r gives similar torque at the wheels anyway plus its lighter. Read..faster and still loses by a decent margin to the wrx)
    Like i said, i love hondas but really there are more reasons than straight line that i like them for. They are quick in their own right, they are very well made, handle nicely, ride nicely etc etc but a wrx WILL beat it in acceleration tests. But like i said 'who cares?' I mean its interesting to know and i understand why you ask the question as everyone loves to get comparisons like that but the answer is simple, the rex is quicker. But the accord is probably a much better car to drive to the coast and back.
    Last edited by crx51; 01-06-2006 at 01:10 AM. Reason: disjointed sentence not picked up on before posting

  4. #76
    "H22A prelude is same speed as B18C2 VTi-R Teg."

    i dont think the VTi-R teg is as strong as the h22a. ..
    yous must be talking about the aus spec h22a

  5. #77
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Brisbane
    Car:
    ap1.5
    stock type Rs can beat stock wrx's rolling start

  6. #78
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Newcastle
    Car:
    Lexus IS300
    But seriously how many stock WRX's are out there!

    I have a few mates with them, and I know for a fact they are damn quick street cars with just minor mods (FMIC, ECU/CHIP, Filter, cat back exhaust) = 180kw at all 4 wheels on a conservative dyno.

    I doubt a N/A H22A would come close to that, but compared to a stock WRX Im sure a H22A would at least somewhat keep up.....

  7. #79
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    wagga wagga
    Car:
    CD5 vti-s
    it depends on the driver. The h22a in an accord is very capable. I have seen it with my own eyes lol.

  8. #80
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    wagga wagga
    Car:
    CD5 vti-s
    also a h22a prrelude is going to be slower than a h22a accord as the accords usually are fitted with the jap spec h22a engine which comes with closer ratio gearbox for improved acceleration, an LSD and uses the jap spec ecu which is tuned for 100 octane. the 4th gen preludes are 190 hp and the equvilent jap spec ( where most of the front cut engines come from) are 200hp.


    go look in the timeslip database- j-specs accord has pulled a 14.4 which is faster than a current model WRX and even faster than older rexes.

  9. #81
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Car:
    MY05 Subaru WRX
    No way in hell h22a accord will be able to beat a WRX.
    I had a Prelude Si VTEC before and now have a MY05 WRX and the difference between the two cars in terms of sheer power and acceleration is chalk and cheese.

  10. #82
    Newcomer Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    EG Sedan,GS300
    the prelude si didnt come with a h22a....
    i'd say it will be close depending on driver

  11. #83
    Si VTEC?
    Si's arent vtec. ..
    Prelude Si is just 2.3 no vtec isnt it?

  12. #84
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Car:
    MY05 Subaru WRX
    Quote Originally Posted by burma
    the prelude si didnt come with a h22a....
    i'd say it will be close depending on driver
    Geez. Clearly you don't know much about Prelude do you?
    Si VTEC is a JDM only model and not the same as AUDM Si's that were sold here.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.