Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 40

Thread: Civic Type S

  1. #13
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    West. Real west
    Car:
    None.. yet.
    honda is shitting me!

    The yanks Si is hot! and this type R should be here already...
    Just teasing us until telling us it will be to expensive to import

  2. #14
    looks lyk a dog turd
    dun lyk it weak as shit aswell
    Chunky = the first youngest ozhonda member ever


    OZHONDA 4 LYFE!

  3. #15
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Syd
    Car:
    .
    Yeah that looks bloody crap!
    and its only 102kw? thats a shocker..
    shape is going to take a lot of getting use to.

  4. #16
    Moderator Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    S.E Melb
    Car:
    The non Honda
    Quote Originally Posted by bigjo5
    thats a ***n ugly car man..
    sure is...

  5. #17
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Syd
    Car:
    .
    Ill take the SI sedan over this Type S Anyday!
    The 4 door looks so much hotter, the type s is like a bubble
    lol, shockers!!

  6. #18
    Account Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Pariaman, Indonesia
    Car:
    Mitsubishi Colt TME
    This honda stream from 2007 looks 1000% better





  7. #19
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    sydney
    Car:
    Golf GTI
    i'm thoroughly unimpressed!!

    That s a shit box, and there is no way in hell i'd buy one!

    what the hell is wrong with honda australia, and where the fark is our CTR??

  8. #20
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    DC5S but not for long...
    i acutally dont mind the look lol :P

    but neway the power figure is way down the hole... in a day and age where cars are loaded heavy with equipment 103kw is nothing special. But then it does depend on the nature of the engine i guess. I dont see many ppl complaining about the old SOHC Vtecs, so they shouldnt complain about this

  9. #21
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Syd
    Car:
    .
    Even that looks ugly
    looks like a bigger version of a jazz and the oddessy joint together.
    yuk

  10. #22
    Newcomer Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Car:
    dc2 vtir & 76 260Z
    Quote Originally Posted by **Ghost**
    i acutally dont mind the look lol :P

    but neway the power figure is way down the hole... in a day and age where cars are loaded heavy with equipment 103kw is nothing special. But then it does depend on the nature of the engine i guess. I dont see many ppl complaining about the old SOHC Vtecs, so they shouldnt complain about this
    Pretty much agree. The car looks great but the power output is really disappointing. 100 kW might be passable for a base model, but for a halo S model it is almost laughable.

    They better get the pricing right.

  11. #23
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    CL9 Euro 6MT
    Car:
    Sydney
    huh what did they do to the rear of the car? that looks terrible.

    This is how it should be:
    .© ♪

  12. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by EuroDude
    huh what did they do to the rear of the car? that looks terrible.

    This is how it should be:
    2 door vs 4 door?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.