I plotted swooshek's dyno onto a similar one that I had when the car was first tuned on a similar dyno.
allowing for the shift in the graphs (move the pencilled line about 3/4 of a square to the left) they look quite similar, although I am running about 1-1.5PSI more on average throughout the rev range.
My car still had a 2.25 inch exhaust at this time.
Interesting to compare this chart to the one on the first page as well, that one is about 10kw higher right through the rev range after re-tuning for the new 2.5inch exhaust.
different days, different dynos= 134kw max as compared to this 157kw
DA9 LS w/JDM SiR B18C turbo
Looking for older Honda project car pre-1985
FF - my car seems to hold 10psi fine, need another map sensor?
Nah nah we were tuning it for 22-24psi and it was having issues couldnt figure it out and the only psi that wasnt making my ECU read randomly was 10psi or under so we chucked it at 10psi roughly enough for me to come back after ive figured out the issue. In the end i found that my stock map sensor only reads upto 10psi which i didnt know. Havent got another sensor yet and havent retuned it. So the 10psi tune i have atm was just rough and i got 168kw thats all i was trying to say.
You want to give me that map sensor you got in your toolbox
Nah nah we were tuning it for 22-24psi and it was having issues couldnt figure it out and the only psi that wasnt making my ECU read randomly was 10psi or under so we chucked it at 10psi roughly enough for me to come back after ive figured out the issue. In the end i found that my stock map sensor only reads upto 10psi which i didnt know. Havent got another sensor yet and havent retuned it. So the 10psi tune i have atm was just rough and i got 168kw thats all i was trying to say.
You want to give me that map sensor you got in your toolbox
Stock will handle about 12ish
Na give me your MAP Hao
161.4KW ATW Tuned By TODA EG5 JDM B16A SiR-II TURBO
Bookmarks