Page 5 of 8 FirstFirst ... 2345678 LastLast
Results 49 to 60 of 86

Thread: Wheels

  1. #49
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Victoria
    Car:
    s2000
    man that silver s2k looks tough!

  2. #50
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    01 S2000
    Quote Originally Posted by Silverstone View Post
    20" on stock height would look ridiculous. stick with stock wheels

    BTW How would these look/fit on a s2000 with 1inch drop and what tyres sizes would be best.
    17 x 8.5 offset 35 front
    17 x 9.5 offset 45 rear
    20's look ridiculous at any height, no offence.

    Don't know how it would look but it would definitely rub even with "only" a 1" drop.
    I'd probably run 235/45 on front and 255/40 on rear or 225/45 and 245/40 for less chance of rub.

    All corners will need a roll and bumper tab relocation on the rear I reckon.


    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrari View Post
    What's the benefit of going with 9.5 inch over a 9 inch if your running 255 on both?
    Just makes it look tougher or as those yanks say "hella flush".

    It will probably make your handling worse cause you gotta run excessive negative camber though imo.

    Short answer: no benefit apart from aesthetic

  3. #51
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    red ap1
    Quote Originally Posted by vyets View Post
    Yea I been looking for another pair of CE28's 17x9+40 for the front since LOL no luck


    17x9.5+38 is doable :P not worth it for rpf01 as the rims goes flat/concave at 17x9+45
    im running 18x9.5 +38 on the rears! but with stretched 235/40's and about -3.0camber (on stock body)
    i rekn u could do that with 17s with 255/40s on and about -3.5* depending on how dropped ur gona be!

    my fronts are 17x9 +44 (with a 15mm spacer,so effectively +29 which is basically the same as 17x 9.5 +35)

    with the 9+44 the front fenders were getting mangled without the roll.
    got the fenders rolled and -1.7* it worked fine.

    but with the spacer on, needed to get at least -3.0* to get any clearance with the fender and this was with 225/45's on.
    so will be more of a mission to run 255's on 9.5 +38!
    Last edited by lzybum; 15-04-2010 at 10:24 PM.

  4. #52
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrari View Post
    What's the benefit of going with 9.5 inch over a 9 inch if your running 255 on both?
    incase you want to get wider tyres.

  5. #53
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    west smeobourne
    Car:
    AP1 S13
    8.5" can also run 255's :P Mainly for looks I guess since the 9.5+35 will be easier to fit since the 255's stretch on the 9.5 on a 9+22 its harder to fit, that's if they're going for the concave look.
    FYS

    My fake shit rocks!
    Winton 1:35.4
    Wakefield 1:07.87

  6. #54
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    01 S2000
    For hard parking purposes basically lol

  7. #55
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    00 S2000 09 Audi S3
    I think for CE28 I will be going 17x9 front +54 and 17x9 + 40 rear.

  8. #56
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrari View Post
    I think for CE28 I will be going 17x9 front +54 and 17x9 + 40 rear.
    Sounds good mad, what tyres will you be getting?

  9. #57
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    west smeobourne
    Car:
    AP1 S13
    Should buy VEL's (DC5TYPER) ce28's his got 17x9+54 all round with heaps of tread left on his KU36.. however not too sure if it's sold :P
    FYS

    My fake shit rocks!
    Winton 1:35.4
    Wakefield 1:07.87

  10. #58
    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrari View Post
    Im searching for new wheels at present so many options... I want 17x9 255 all around, just dont know what offset I can run, I only have rolled front and rear fenders, and shaved bumper tabs, and im not looking to change up to wide fenders or run overfender in rear any time soon.
    as vyets said +35 is the way to go
    im planning to go +35 as well

    maybe we can get them shipped together mad

    not ce28's but yea they are +35

    Last edited by sho; 16-04-2010 at 03:54 PM.

  11. #59
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    00 S2000 09 Audi S3
    Quote Originally Posted by vyets View Post
    Should buy VEL's (DC5TYPER) ce28's his got 17x9+54 all round with heaps of tread left on his KU36.. however not too sure if it's sold :P
    I was thinking of getting these, but +54 looks a bit weak in the rear, and there not ti silver in colour.

  12. #60
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Melb SE Suburbs
    Car:
    94 EG, 95 EG
    You wont be saying that when your tires keep throwing dirt on rocks on your paintwork. My fronts do that. But the rears dont.

    Plus best advantage of NON-Stag is you can evenly rotate wheels front and back. Running different offset changes that. You might as well run 17x10 in the rear.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.