Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 38
  1. #13
    TRAVDM Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    BNE, Q
    Car:
    Lots of Hondas
    js racing is bad!




    oh wrd!

  2. #14
    Ninja turtle Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Chloe
    Quote Originally Posted by weeman View Post
    but the throttle body end is still the same size as the standard one so the velocity will be exactly the same
    With the stock intake arm, there are times when the vacuum is there in the intake manifold to draw air in, but there is not enough air flowing in the intake arm to satisfy the amount that is required.

    The large volume and smooth curved design of the J's Racing intake tries to maintain the amount of air available at full throttle and high RPM. If you have an MAP sensor, you should get readings closer to atmospheric pressure with the J's racing when compared to the stock intake arm with a pod filter.
    --------------------------------------
    Stocky CL9 - 1:17.2

  3. #15
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    woy woy
    Car:
    93 integra vtir
    fair enough, thanx aarong, your smart +1 rep for you

  4. #16
    I've seen a clone J's racing intakes on several different cars now, not a single one of them made as much power as they did with a long ram intake, as tested on the same cars.
    -It made less power on my car than the modified stock airbox.

    I'd be interested in testing a genuine article on the dyno... They look nice and sound good, not a chance in hell I'd consider forking out for one without some back to back testing though.

  5. #17
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    woy woy
    Car:
    93 integra vtir
    how much is the genuine one

  6. #18
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Adelaide
    Car:
    EK CiviC
    Any dyno results and was this with enclosed airbox with cold air feed or was the pod open to the engine bay heat?
    Project Civic777 - obsession for achievement

  7. #19
    In all instances, the cars were dyno'd with bonnets up. Heat soak was not an issue.

    It is to do with the length of the intake. The short-rams and J's racing style intakes are too short.

  8. #20
    Ozhonda Trader Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Sydney.
    Car:
    EGK24A
    Quote Originally Posted by ginganggooly View Post
    I've seen a clone J's racing intakes on several different cars now, not a single one of them made as much power as they did with a long ram intake, as tested on the same cars.
    -It made less power on my car than the modified stock airbox.

    I'd be interested in testing a genuine article on the dyno... They look nice and sound good, not a chance in hell I'd consider forking out for one without some back to back testing though.
    agreed
    Been running few intake set up on my b series and run it on the dyno.
    J's racing didnt make as much power compared to long ram intake or mugen intake.
    Last edited by EG5; 14-12-2006 at 03:05 AM.
    JDMyard Pty Ltd
    25 / 317-321 Woodpark Rd , Smithfield , NSW 2164. Contact : 02 97572364
    Email : yonas@jdmyard.com , Facebook : http://www.facebook.com/JDMYard
    www.JDMyard.com

  9. #21
    Ozhonda Trader Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Sydney.
    Car:
    EGK24A
    Quote Originally Posted by egSi View Post
    js racing is bad!
    Based on what ? blingy looks ? loudness ?
    JDMyard Pty Ltd
    25 / 317-321 Woodpark Rd , Smithfield , NSW 2164. Contact : 02 97572364
    Email : yonas@jdmyard.com , Facebook : http://www.facebook.com/JDMYard
    www.JDMyard.com

  10. #22
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Car:
    1999 Honda Civic SiR
    Yes it has been proven that the AEM Cold Air intake makes more power than the J's Racing intake. However, the J's racing intake increases throttle response (and sounds sweet in vtec!).

    I wish I had those dyno charts when they did a generic short ram vs J's vs AEM 3" Cold Air. The AEM made a few more peak WHP at the end of the rev range, but the J's had the best midrange.
    AEBS - PIC Peformance - HKS - GReddy - Recaro - Mugen - Skunk2 - Spoon - ASR - Carbing - Vibrant - Work - KICS - Falken

  11. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Bleh View Post
    Yes it has been proven that the AEM Cold Air intake makes more power than the J's Racing intake. However, the J's racing intake increases throttle response (and sounds sweet in vtec!).

    I wish I had those dyno charts when they did a generic short ram vs J's vs AEM 3" Cold Air. The AEM made a few more peak WHP at the end of the rev range, but the J's had the best midrange.

    The long ram intakes i've seen were louder than the j's racing style intakes too

    I can't comment on throttle response as I've not driven a car with a J's racing intake bolted in, but if it's anything like any other shortram, then the throttle response effect is probably a by-product of the placebo effect

  12. #24
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Adelaide
    Car:
    EK CiviC
    gingangooly, can you post the dyno printouts or direct to a website with them? What figures and shapes are we talking here?
    Project Civic777 - obsession for achievement

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.