Page 10 of 23 FirstFirst ... 7891011121320 ... LastLast
Results 109 to 120 of 268
  1. #109
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    1998 EK civic
    an eg wouldnt beat an rx8.. the power difference is too great, eg's dont rev hard or high enough, and neither does an ek.. a DC2R would be an appropiate sparring partner for straight line performance.. they both do 0-100 in the mid to low 6's eg's take forever and eks take even longer

  2. #110
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    perth
    Car:
    eg sedan
    your talking about gli eg's and ek's arent you?

  3. #111
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Adelaide
    Car:
    happy car
    a h22a in a ek would do alright though :d

  4. #112
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Melb
    Car:
    BLZ-ARW019
    At the end of the day, an RX8 is a sports car, and a civic is a shopping trolley...
    blz-arw019

  5. #113
    Ninja turtle Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Chloe
    Quote Originally Posted by IRI View Post
    At the end of the day, an RX8 is a sports car, and a civic is a shopping trolley...
    Last I checked, the Civic could carry 5 people in addition to your groceries over a range of over 400km. Doesn't sound like a shopping trolley to me.
    --------------------------------------
    Stocky CL9 - 1:17.2

  6. #114
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    1998 EK civic
    Quote Originally Posted by d15z1SUX View Post
    your talking about gli eg's and ek's arent you?
    no.. no im not... those take even longer and i wouldnt even bother mentioning them against any car..

  7. #115
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    perth
    Car:
    eg sedan
    an ek isnt that much slower than a type r i thought? dc2r does 0 - 400m in mid 14's to high 14's. ek vtir does the quarter in low 15's? so that would translate to a low 7 second 0 - 100kph?

  8. #116
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    2001 DC2R
    RX7 was aimed at Porsche, whilst RX8 at Integras, 200SX's etc
    My order's simple... a sh*#load of dim sims and a bucket of soya sauce.
    Low cost mod: Filled my car with helium balloons. Power to weight biaaaaatch!

  9. #117
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    HPR Workshop
    Car:
    Honda Camira
    Quote Originally Posted by e240 View Post
    It makes that much power because its an almost continuous firing cycle much like the 2 stroke (Also why the fuel consumption is high as well) unlike a four stroke...

    Four Stroke
    1. Compression (Upward)
    2. Firing (Downard) - Power Stroke
    3. Exhaust (Upward)
    4. Intake (Downard)

    Two Stroke
    1. Compression + Intake (at the same time)
    2. Firing - Power Stroke
    3. Exhaust + Filling of cylinder with fresh charge...

    Rotary
    1. Intake + Compression + Exhaust + Power stroke all at the same time...LOL

    ahahh and also
    Rotary
    2. round and round and not up and down
    Last edited by BlitZ; 12-08-2007 at 06:56 PM.
    Club EM1 Represents - member 01 of 01

  10. #118
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Melb
    Car:
    BLZ-ARW019
    Quote Originally Posted by aaronng View Post
    Last I checked, the Civic could carry 5 people in addition to your groceries over a range of over 400km. Doesn't sound like a shopping trolley to me.
    That sounds exactly like a shopping trolley
    blz-arw019

  11. #119
    EK VTiR do the 0-400m around 7.7 to 7.8s.

    Nothing to brag about. I have driven the EK4s completely stock and modded. EK4 stock is slow as. If you don't launch it properly it'll do around 8.0s (timed using accelerometer). Very underpowered stock EKs it feels like its not moving.

    Mod it however it turns into a beast. Even with I/H/E it feels much faster especially at higher revs. Very good rolling speed but at the same time, still a very ordinary launching speed. A stock Lancer 1.8L will still beat a modded EK4 time after time, yet, race on a roll and the EK would kill the lancer by miles. Just different torque distribution curve really.

    Anyway, stock RX-8s are definitely much faster than stock EKs but against modded EK, I would say RX-8 launches better but rolling start, both similar enough.

    By the way like YFIN said the GTRs are always underquoted. And even if it wasn't, it has AWD launch plus Turbo. Turbo torque distribution means it has more area under the curve so even if both cars were 206KW, the one with more torque will always accelerate faster. 2ndly AWD gives it better 0-60ft time so again it goes faster again.

    Not sure if ppl realise but a 5s 0-100km/h FWD vs a 5s 0-100km/h RWD vs a 5s 0-100km/h AWD will actually still have speed differences. It depends how much distance they need to obtain 0-100km/h. So if you think the 0-100km/h is all that matters then pls remember, i.e. an AWD at 6.0s probably sounds slow but it will actually still beat most other 5.5 or 5.8s 0-100km/h cars. Rolling start is another matter but if you race from the lights at drag strip the time shown and who reaches line first will differ.

    Anyway, the RX-8s are OVER-QUOTED. Had a lawsuit and recall in the US due to that matter lol.
    Last edited by Omotesando; 12-08-2007 at 08:48 PM.

  12. #120
    Ninja turtle Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Chloe
    Quote Originally Posted by IRI View Post
    That sounds exactly like a shopping trolley
    Wow, the M5 is a shopping trolley too!
    --------------------------------------
    Stocky CL9 - 1:17.2

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.