Page 24 of 313 FirstFirst ... 14212223242526273474124 ... LastLast
Results 277 to 288 of 3745
  1. #277
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    aowallans house
    Car:
    shooting star
    i asked adrian from toda, he said i would probably require OBD1 as the OBD0 vtec ecu is hard to source. vtec wont kick in unless i get a OBD0 vtec ecu which is i think the CRX JDM 89-91 i think. which is hard to source.

    engine mounts remain the same.
    gearbox remains the same.
    *ecu i gotta change from my knowledge.
    dizzy has to be changed as its non vtec dizzy. aftermarket dizzys and stuff im not so sure about but i'll do my research tonight.

    any else i might need to know ? if you can, point form please =)

  2. #278
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    180sx , DA9 sir
    i have a obd1 b16a dizzy without cap, pm me if u interest
    Last edited by 180sx; 18-04-2008 at 11:34 PM.

  3. #279
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    DA6K20A CD5H23T
    if you still need the obd0 vtec ecu, let me know

    can hook you up with a stock one or modded fully tuneable one

    Quote Originally Posted by Samm928 View Post
    i asked adrian from toda, he said i would probably require OBD1 as the OBD0 vtec ecu is hard to source. vtec wont kick in unless i get a OBD0 vtec ecu which is i think the CRX JDM 89-91 i think. which is hard to source.

    engine mounts remain the same.
    gearbox remains the same.
    *ecu i gotta change from my knowledge.
    dizzy has to be changed as its non vtec dizzy. aftermarket dizzys and stuff im not so sure about but i'll do my research tonight.

    any else i might need to know ? if you can, point form please =)

  4. #280
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Seeming as the CD5 Accord lip fits the 89-91 front bar (with modifications).

    I assume the a type R styled lip for a CD5 would fit the 92-93 front bars with no cutting etc.

    (apart from the drilling/screwing side of things)



    Right or Wrong?

    As there a heap cheaper to purchase than the DA9 Type R styled lip.

  5. #281
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    Poo-goat 307
    Quote Originally Posted by DA9B18C View Post
    i have same experience and would have to disagree, IMO. the obd1 is a easier ecu to tune and program then the obd0. there is much more flexability with the obd1.

    also on that note, in no contrast of making a sale. honestly (i forgot i had it spare). i have a obd0-obd1 conversion harness. real cheap. pm me for more info.
    lol, you're not disagreeing about anything.
    To run his b16 swap effectively he can stay obdo instead of obd1.
    I was merly stating what can run his swap.
    Besides both ecus need to be chipped or opened up to use them for ROM tuning anyways.

  6. #282
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Melb
    Car:
    CL9
    Quote Originally Posted by ACTI0NMAN-1 View Post
    lol, you're not disagreeing about anything.
    To run his b16 swap effectively he can stay obdo instead of obd1.
    I was merly stating what can run his swap.
    Besides both ecus need to be chipped or opened up to use them for ROM tuning anyways.

    fair enough, valid point.
    HCCM#23

    02 DC5 ITR

  7. #283
    I'm looking to upgrade my suspension soon. Might get some coilovers, any recommendations? Would EG front folk/coilovers setup be better?

    i have these same wheels so i'm looking to get the same ride hight, i might need some negative camber?




    Any help?
    Last edited by BeEasy; 20-04-2008 at 02:01 AM.

  8. #284
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    Poo-goat 307
    Quote Originally Posted by BeEasy View Post
    I'm looking to upgrade my suspension soon. Might get some coilovers, any recommendations? Would EG front folk/coilovers setup be better?

    i have these same wheels so i'm looking to get the same ride hight, i might need some negative camber?




    Any help?
    lol due to the convex shape of the underside of our DA's (mainly caused by the exhaust) the ride height depicted is not street drivable, as the only place you could drive this height is on a track or a runway.

  9. #285
    Quote Originally Posted by ACTI0NMAN-1 View Post
    lol due to the convex shape of the underside of our DA's (mainly caused by the exhaust) the ride height depicted is not street drivable, as the only place you could drive this height is on a track or a runway.
    You couldn't take that too the track. Insufficient suspension travel, unless you plan on cruising around at 60kph.

  10. #286
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Car:
    ex-DA9, Altezza
    Quote Originally Posted by string View Post
    You couldn't take that too the track. Insufficient suspension travel, unless you plan on cruising around at 60kph.
    wot if the suspension is stiff and its not suppose for it to travel that much?
    ModBox

  11. #287
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    ^ thats 1 hot DA.

  12. #288
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Brisbane
    Car:
    DA9
    if you tried to drive that da on the street your front lip wouldn't last a day.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.