I had my standard 2007 6MT Euro but this new Euro has emotionally affected me to update the car......Should I update one or not? I still think my Euro is still very nice to drive...or I wait until the new Euro got facelifted in its mid-life (2-3 years later maybe)?
If you're rich and can take a massive depreciation hit in one year; go for it. But otherwise, wait until you can spread the depreciation over a number of years.
SPQR The first ever Whiteline RSB pattern for CL9 Euro. The world first ever after market RSB for RE4 CRV.
Laggy kickdown is not caused by drive by wire. It is caused by the auto transmission's ECU control.
CL9 DBW is quite refined in autocar generally (no drivetrain shunting like the manual) but there are those moments when you've slowed right down, see a break in traffic, and tell the load pedal "go, go, go now!" like your life depended on it and you get naaaaathing. Then two seconds later, whoa, hang on to your horses; we're coming through!
Actually, not too much different to my old WRX manual when off-boost; then, bang (for your buck) on-boost like a freight train. Gee I miss that turbo rush. I don't miss the crap interior.
SPQR The first ever Whiteline RSB pattern for CL9 Euro. The world first ever after market RSB for RE4 CRV.
Have a look at the specs of the new Euro on Honda's web site. It's as big as a Camry almost as wide as a Falcon and heavier than any car in its class. Even heavier than the 4 cylinder Accord. The size of the CL9 was spot on. But the increase in weigh in this day and age is just inexplicable.
Work out the Kg/Kw for yourselves. On paper it needs the extra power and torque just to almost keep up the the 08.
Is Honda after a new market or missing the point?
Have a look at the specs of the new Euro on Honda's web site. It's as big as a Camry almost as wide as a Falcon and heavier than any car in its class. Even heavier than the 4 cylinder Accord. The size of the CL9 was spot on. But the increase in weigh in this day and age is just inexplicable.
Work out the Kg/Kw for yourselves. On paper it needs the extra power and torque just to almost keep up the the 08.
Is Honda after a new market or missing the point?
And yet the CU2 is faster than the CL9... go figure?
Camry's are around 1500kgs too. 1460kgs for base, 1530kg for top. Spec's add to weight. The CU2 is a very well appointed car.
Work out the Kg/Kw for yourselves. On paper it needs the extra power and torque just to almost keep up the the 08.
Is Honda after a new market or missing the point?
On paper does not tell the whole story. Look at the dynos of the 09 TSX. Lots of torque everywhere at low to mid RPM compared to the CL9.
What do you mean by new market or missing the point? The Euro is meant to be a mid-sized family car, not some sports car wannabe! Fortunately, they decided to upside the new Euro, because the old one had insufficient legroom in the rear (for me at least)
Weight increase could be the fact that the new Euro has a stiffer chassis - high tensile steel used: in case of a accident, then the car absorbs the damage better. Curtain airbags is another item added onto the two Euro grades, I can't think of anything else atm that would contribute to the weight increase - but the new Euro had better fuel consumption than the CL9 - both manual and auto : 8.9 litres/100km (despite the increase in weight) and it's faster and more refined than the CL9(I still like the CL9 despite the CU2 Euro fighting for my attention )
I still like the CL9 despite the CU2 Euro fighting for my attention
Me too, but I couldn't lay money down on a CL9 with the new CU2 sitting there. If I for any reason at all thought the CU2 wasn't an improvement, I would have got a Liberty.
(I wanted a GT-B but the missus said no.... again )
Bookmarks