Page 12 of 14 FirstFirst ... 291011121314 LastLast
Results 133 to 144 of 163
  1. #133
    Ninja turtle Array
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Chloe
    Quote Originally Posted by panda[cRx] View Post
    i was told by one of the honda aust head honchos at this stage it's unlikely this will be sold in australia
    I don't blame them, especially after the poor record of new NSX sales. They do need to bring the FD2 Type R in! haha. Honda will be bleeding in the sports hatch/sedan market when the Ralliart Lancer is released here. Then the EVO X will be the nail in the coffin.
    --------------------------------------
    Stocky CL9 - 1:17.2

  2. #134
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    sydney
    Car:
    dc2r
    Quote Originally Posted by aaronng View Post
    I don't blame them, especially after the poor record of new NSX sales. They do need to bring the FD2 Type R in! haha. Honda will be bleeding in the sports hatch/sedan market when the Ralliart Lancer is released here. Then the EVO X will be the nail in the coffin.
    i saw the first evo x roll off the truck today. looks like the nail is already in lol.
    DR HONDA pit crew

  3. #135
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Adelaide
    Car:
    '06 FD2 Sports
    Be good if it isn't sold locally. Means we can import it eventually.

  4. #136
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Geelong,Vic.
    Car:
    2011 FPV F6
    Quote Originally Posted by aaronng View Post
    I don't blame them, especially after the poor record of new NSX sales. They do need to bring the FD2 Type R in! haha. Honda will be bleeding in the sports hatch/sedan market when the Ralliart Lancer is released here. Then the EVO X will be the nail in the coffin.
    Yep the NSX was a disappointment in terms of sales.The outgoing NSX was $225,000?so one can imagine what would be the price of this V10 machine.

    The FD2 would certainly be a competitor to the WRX and Ralliart-but I don't think it could match it with the EVO X or STI in terms of performance and everyday driving.
    I think and I hate to say it,the next generation of Type Rs may need to be turbo or supercharged.
    It's just becoming increasingly difficult for Honda to compete with these force fed cars.

  5. #137
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ippy
    Car:
    EM1
    honda should def do a SC-CTR.
    they'd still be different cause everyone else is going turbo and it would certainly put them ahead
    FOR SALE: Injector seal kits || Dayco B16A timing belt

  6. #138
    Newcomer Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Quote Originally Posted by xplod_accord View Post
    Be good if it isn't sold locally. Means we can import it eventually.
    For those who'll be able to afford it! haha

  7. #139
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    Mville station + 423 bus
    Quote Originally Posted by xxxlude View Post
    Look's like an S2000 had sex with a Maserati
    more like a ferrari 599 and the AUDM CTR had a baby lol.
    PSN: Ply88

    Games:CODMW2FIFA10SF4Tekken6Pro Evolution Soccer

  8. #140
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sydney Harbour Bridge
    Car:
    03 CL9 Euro
    holy crap man, rather save up for a house then.

    but it looks bloody sex'd
    vTeK 4-Life!
    FOR SALE: CL9

  9. #141
    Quote Originally Posted by jugbugz View Post
    I know I exagerated it a bit but my point is just that they do hit 100% VE narrowly and over on tuned engines. VE means how much air is filled in the cylinder per RPM. If it's fully filled then its 100% VE. 80% filled is 80% VE. Thats where that paragraph after vtec came from. Thats what I learnt anyway.
    Just admit your wrong, your information is horrid.

  10. #142
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Cremorne, Sydney
    Car:
    Js Racing Time Attack DC5
    Quote Originally Posted by fasthonda View Post
    Yep the NSX was a disappointment in terms of sales.The outgoing NSX was $225,000?so one can imagine what would be the price of this V10 machine.

    The FD2 would certainly be a competitor to the WRX and Ralliart-but I don't think it could match it with the EVO X or STI in terms of performance and everyday driving.
    I think and I hate to say it,the next generation of Type Rs may need to be turbo or supercharged.
    It's just becoming increasingly difficult for Honda to compete with these force fed cars.
    Almost never gonna happen. Honda have always prided themselves on achieving big numbers via NA. The FD2 is more than worthy in a battle with the Evo X and STi. Look at the AMS S2000 at Superlap last year. Just 300PS with 1,200kg body and ran 56s. At the track it's all about linear power delivery and mid corner grip. For a FWD the FD2 has bucketloads of both.

  11. #143
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Cremorne, Sydney
    Car:
    Js Racing Time Attack DC5
    Quote Originally Posted by kraiye View Post
    honda should def do a SC-CTR.
    they'd still be different cause everyone else is going turbo and it would certainly put them ahead
    Volkswagen says

    They are rolling out direct injection twin charge engines across their entire range over the next 2 years. Quite alot of other Eu manufacturers are developing the same technology. It's the way force fed engines will be heading.

  12. #144
    Quote Originally Posted by ~Sp33~ View Post
    Just admit your wrong, your information is horrid.
    Are we still saying N/A engines dont hit over 100% VE?

    http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=152096
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volumetric_efficiency

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.