Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 73 to 84 of 93
  1. #73
    midori Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    south west!
    Car:
    EK4
    i havent dyno or even tuned the car yet..

    havent gotten to that point yet
    lol

  2. #74
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Car:
    380GT,XTrailSTR
    Quote Originally Posted by dupac-> View Post
    i havent dyno or even tuned the car yet..

    havent gotten to that point yet
    lol
    without the tune, any idle issues?



    also my other question is, my current stock tb has the iacv block off plate and coolant bypass.. does it really matter if i get the b16a/b18c2 or ITR tb? i just noticed itr variants cost a bit more and have the iacv built in which i won't use anyway?
    Quote Originally Posted by Slow96GSR
    If 1 person has had bad luck with a product don’t condemn it until you yourself have tested it. Now if 10 pros have tried it and it sucked then I would trust their opinion.

  3. #75
    Account Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Garage
    70mm here on a b16a

  4. #76
    midori Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    south west!
    Car:
    EK4
    Quote Originally Posted by dsp26 View Post
    without the tune, any idle issues?



    also my other question is, my current stock tb has the iacv block off plate and coolant bypass.. does it really matter if i get the b16a/b18c2 or ITR tb? i just noticed itr variants cost a bit more and have the iacv built in which i won't use anyway?
    i have no issues with the idle at all.. the 62mm isnt overly huge so it seems ok with the skunk im. i got the itr tb.

    b18c2 the earlier models have that built in iacv ur talking about.. i know there's been issues with idles and shit like that.. rpm raise n dropping. my mate had exact same issues.

    he wasrunning a b18c2 with a older model b18c2 tb with that built in iavc.. now changed it to the same tb that it was meant to be running no issues.
    if that makes ssense?



    i know a friend is using a 68mm on his itr and has dramas with idle and cold starts.. pain in the ass..

  5. #77
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Car:
    380GT,XTrailSTR
    Quote Originally Posted by Benson View Post
    70mm here on a b16a


    yours/fatboyz setup is what got me intrigued... basically same setup except for CR and IM+TB.... i'm trying to account for the missing 5-7wkw across the rpm band and the 16wkw difference in peak

    also if yous is 70mm.. what is the ID of the intake mani your using? ITR 64/62mm?
    Last edited by dsp26; 23-09-2008 at 10:19 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Slow96GSR
    If 1 person has had bad luck with a product don’t condemn it until you yourself have tested it. Now if 10 pros have tried it and it sucked then I would trust their opinion.

  6. #78
    Dupac, what you mean by iacv built onto the b18c2 tb, Do you mean the Fitv?
    You guys reckon it should be fine using a 68mm Tb with out porting my IM? IM currently at 64mm.

  7. #79
    midori Array
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    south west!
    Car:
    EK4
    lol yeah fitv?

    i dunno theres something on the older tb's on the b18c2.. that affects the idle

  8. #80
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Car:
    380GT,XTrailSTR
    I understand how this all works now after a total of 5hrs continuous research on the physics and why bensons/fatboyz 70mm Tb works with the 64mm ITR IM....


    you don't match TB size to IM inlet size.. you match TB size to the plenum volume..... but in their case its working like a taper anyway.. minus maybe some turbulance cause by a flat 'lip' on the IM due to it being smaller than the TB

    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelDelaney @TeamIntegra
    the low rod ratio of our Tegs already causes the piston speeds to be optimized for cylinder filling during the intake stroke at low-mid rpms. So if you already are having enough suck at low rpms an oversized TB bore will just make that more apparent. But as rpms increase, the time spent in the intake stroke shortens. Our low rod ratio and the pistons speeds away from TDC don't help cylinder filling under these conditions. The low rod ratio engine needs help filling at high rpms from ram air and scavenging. You need good flow speeds out of the IM plenum and down to the head to create the ram air. If the TB is too big, the flow speed dies. Couple that with a shorter fill time and a big TB bore just kills filling at the top rpms where you need it the most for low ets.

    This isn't theory. People have theorized it and then shown this theory to be true in real life.

    You have to understand how the engine parts work together: rod ratio, cam spec, port size, IM plenum volume and runner dimensions, and TB bore. They are all connected. Each one determines the other's size. They inter-relate. They all center around where your powerband
    should be placed along your rpm range.
    Quote Originally Posted by Slow96GSR
    If 1 person has had bad luck with a product don’t condemn it until you yourself have tested it. Now if 10 pros have tried it and it sucked then I would trust their opinion.

  9. #81
    Account Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Garage
    we running skunk2 manifold...not sure if the opening is ported...

  10. #82
    Member Array
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Car:
    delsol crx
    im going to be using a ITR manifold with a obx 68mm TB... because i got nthe tb cheap... we will see how i goo that might be a month or two away

  11. #83
    Member Array
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Car:
    380GT,XTrailSTR
    Quote Originally Posted by delsol9000rpms View Post
    im going to be using a ITR manifold with a obx 68mm TB... because i got nthe tb cheap... we will see how i goo that might be a month or two away
    let us know how it goes....

    you gonna dyno after and overlay to your current?


    i just ordered a 65mm coz it came with a free block off plate for whatever it is at the bottom of the tb (fitv/iacv..)


    Would've loved to get this hyped one though... 68mm tapered to 65mm at the plenum.. worked out to be ~AU$210shipped



    also found a 72mm tapered to 65mm with a free brand new oem tps already bolted and calibrated for ~AU$230 shipped
    Quote Originally Posted by Slow96GSR
    If 1 person has had bad luck with a product don’t condemn it until you yourself have tested it. Now if 10 pros have tried it and it sucked then I would trust their opinion.

  12. #84
    Account Disabled Array
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Garage
    Those are the tb that we use... i find them much better than the billet ones...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.3


Terms and Conditions
Ozhonda.com is in no way affiliated with the Honda motor company or Honda Australia in anyway whatsoever.