that means i should save a little bit more money to get gruppeM instead. thx for the input nepolian.
Realistically, an CAI would be the most effective when it comes to power per dollar ratio. But some people don't like the aesthetics of a CAI and prefer the bling of the GruppeM, each to their own I suppose.
Realistically, an CAI would be the most effective when it comes to power per dollar ratio. But some people don't like the aesthetics of a CAI and prefer the bling of the GruppeM, each to their own I suppose.
I have a fujita CAI installed now and i am very happy with it. However i am a bit curious about the significant improvement in terms of power by using gruppem. i believe that is the most talked/popular topic in this thread.
no way i'd spend $1.2k for an intake. particularly the fitment issue of the Gruppe M with EP3 (i must add Gruppe M on some cars are good tho, eg Euro, M3 etc)
as Nepolian said, CAI is the best gain/value. i got Fujita becos it was $100 cheaper than Injen at the time. and $399 vs $1200, i can't justify 3x the cost for CF bling + a few kw here and there. plus i don't mind the hole in the engine bay.
would love to find a way to run a pipe for the CAI tho. it seems quite difficult.
no way i'd spend $1.2k for an intake. particularly the fitment issue of the Gruppe M with EP3 (i must add Gruppe M on some cars are good tho, eg Euro, M3 etc)
as Nepolian said, CAI is the best gain/value. i got Fujita becos it was $100 cheaper than Injen at the time. and $399 vs $1200, i can't justify 3x the cost for CF bling + a few kw here and there. plus i don't mind the hole in the engine bay.
would love to find a way to run a pipe for the CAI tho. it seems quite difficult.
True philip. i might keep my CAI for a bit longer then. i should save my money and stop upgrading unnecessary things
Bookmarks