EF9 vs EG6 what would you buy?

**~Sp33~** · 03-09-2009 01:01 AM

oh lord, now im not sure.

**YaMiKaZe** · 03-09-2009 02:12 AM

ive gotta drive a genuine eg6 one day.
i'd think the eg6's are rarer than the ef9's.
i see more guys on ozhonda own a ef9 than an eg6, only person i know that owns an eg6 is 90lan whereas theres a couple of members that have ef9's

**90LAN** · 03-09-2009 06:54 AM

because heaps were imported when the 15 year rule came into effect

**Paul1985** · 03-09-2009 08:04 AM

Originally Posted by 90LAN

because heaps were imported when the 15 year rule came into effect

Could you get EG6's in now?

Some of them are over 15 years old now.

**~Sp33~** · 03-09-2009 08:17 AM

Originally Posted by YaMiKaZe

ive gotta drive a genuine eg6 one day.
i'd think the eg6's are rarer than the ef9's.

That's because ef9>eg6.

**Cooker** · 03-09-2009 09:03 AM

Originally Posted by ~Sp33~

Fail.

Oh so in standard form a 1989 EF9 is better then an 1995 EG6 SIR????
So honda made the EF9 and then all civic models after that were crap?
Stop wanking over EF9, at the end of the day they are old shitters, the japs would be in fits of laughter if they saw this thread, they are worth bugger all over there, no one wants them, just cos they ain't abundant over here doesn't mean they are awesome.

**~Sp33~** · 03-09-2009 09:35 AM

The statement i quoted had nothing to do with the ef9. Also, i never said that newer cars were crap, i just implied that they're not better.

I'm not going to turn this into a new/old debate, though for an enthusiast, old cars have much more to offer. An enthusiast doesn't care about airbags/safety equipment, emissions, fuel economy. All the things that make a car slow and heavy. One of the main reason that old models and engines get killed off of the assembly line is because they can't meet new safety and emission regulations.

Thus, your statement about 'new is nearly always better', is fail.

Originally Posted by Cooker

So honda made the EF9 and then all civic models after that were crap?

All the models after the EF5 were crap.

**Dems** · 03-09-2009 09:42 AM

Originally Posted by Cooker

Oh so in standard form a 1989 EF9 is better then an 1995 EG6 SIR????
So honda made the EF9 and then all civic models after that were crap?
Stop wanking over EF9, at the end of the day they are old shitters, the japs would be in fits of laughter if they saw this thread, they are worth bugger all over there, no one wants them, just cos they ain't abundant over here doesn't mean they are awesome.

hey buddy new isn't always better!

I am sure there are improvements on every new chassis but company's direction changes over models.

so your view seems very ignorant...

just look at the EP3 civic vs. the FN2R

this thread is not about whats BETTER, but whats best for the original poster
or what we would choose and why.

we are looking at part availability, handling etc.

so your answer is because it's "new" it's better.

leave it at that mate.

**FastFwd** · 03-09-2009 11:50 AM

i think the original poster has gotten a good taste of what people think about the two.

Both are great cars, some may have its advantages and some may have its disadvantages in area's. But in the end they are very even.

Now the thread has just turned into an EG FANBOY vs EF FANBOY war.

personally i picked the EG because in my eyes the eg is newer and has a nicer shape, but others may think differently and we are all to our own opinions.

**Bludger** · 03-09-2009 11:55 AM

Originally Posted by FastFwd

i think the original poster has gotten a good taste of what people think about the two.

Both are great cars, some may have its advantages and some may have its disadvantages in area's. But in the end they are very even.

Now the thread has just turned into an EG FANBOY vs EF FANBOY war.

personally i picked the EG because in my eyes the eg is newer and has a nicer shape, but others may think differently and we are all to our own opinions.

Piss OFFFFFFF

LOL

EF8 FTW!!!!!!!!!!!