at wakefield, i was pulling away from the EVOs & WRX and some skylines
Trust me they certainly get suprised
Main reason why N/A is better for track is usually down to reliability due to heat.
Turbos need more cooling & loose power if they get too hot.
just need good oil cooler and better radiator
N/A is more consistent and sometimes being underpowered helps going through some of the corners, easier without fighting the car.
i own a eg and and i have a b16 in it aswell. i was in the same situation as yours about a month ago into going to turbo or a k20 swap. well these are the facts you need to factor as every1 has different thoughts and what they really want.
in my situation there was a turbo kit setup for 3.5g or a complete k series swap for 11g-12g and plus sell my engine. i thought about it and i went for the turbo as i got to save money and i could spend the money on biking a bike for myself and pay for uni.
atm im pulling 150kws at 7psi so its quite a decent number. I dont race much on the streets but i have taken on 2 cars which were 2 rexies 04 sti which i beat about a car's length and another of the 2 door sti.
there is alot of aspects you need to consider, but the main aspect for me was i wanted quick power for cheap so that was the choice. if you have any questions feel free to pm
my thoughts are, if you wanna run more than 7-8psi you pretty much should be rebuilding the engine anyway. might as well get a b20 and build that to handle the boost while still being able to drive the b16 around.
my 2c
FOR SALE: Injector seal kits || Dayco B16A timing belt
come and watch me on the straight at wakefield LOL, i'm not as quick as them on the corners but i can certainly out run them with my long legs... hahaha
i just brought a cam for my car will post some pics up when i go next
P.S B20 apparently have weak sleeve/walls, i dunno if you can make it a good boost engine. Better of boosting a k20
Bookmarks