i reckon this survey is crap because what, 19% of honda owners give a positive rating, so over 80% have negative ratings yet own the cars?

this is what i love about statistics, it's complete crap.

also the demographic of who is involved is probably never disclosed. i always prove stats wrong because in my business i've had to nail sales people trying to get multimillion dollar contracts based on "statistics"

for example, perhaps most old people buy mitsubishi and honda, seems to be a trend i've noticed if you go outside of the performance cars, but focus on the most popular selling cars and then who buys those ones new, old people wanting something reliable. then say the survey asks "how happy are you with servicing costs" some old person, moaning about the economy, has a weak pension and then has a biased negative view because their service costs $500 and that is too expensive because they are poor, yet they paid $20k for a car with cash. this then brings the overall customer feedback low. yet they may like the car in general and the money point of view has clouded their judgement.

how come no brands ranked over 50% which should be easy if most people originally picked a brand of car that they like, say me for example, i find honda is a good brand, i would have rated them quite high. compared to an old person, i'm young, earn good money, have a good life, car's been reliable, sure pay a bit for stuff but the reliability is there, i'd give them 80% easy in feedback. my next car will easily be a new bmw or something, but this stage in life the honda has served me well.

make a real survey with real results to get any recognition.