New CR-Z

[rossirider]

What CRZ community?

[UNLS1]

i dont think u would see many men driving the veloster or the turbo. deff a chicks car. (or girly man)

[denot]

i dont think u would see many men driving the veloster or the turbo. deff a chicks car. (or girly man)

meh, better than not seeing anyone driving CRZ at all... oh wait, there that "dreamer" guy

[UNLS1]

meh, better than not seeing anyone driving CRZ at all... oh wait, there that "dreamer" guy

lol true just the dreamer boy. the veloster is marketed at women anyway. not exactly a blokes car lol

[chunky]

^yeah every single one i see has a young/middle aged woman driving it bar this white one always parked at uni driven by this 18yrold hipster guy that looks extremely proud of it, but still good on him

[denot]

^yeah every single one i see has a young/middle aged woman driving it bar this white one always parked at uni driven by this 18yrold hipster guy that looks extremely proud of it, but still good on him

Its my wife, but I'm still proud of it

[Indie]

This doesn't mean much, though. Most Integras I see are driven by 50yr-old women, too.

[newpaddy3]

This doesn't mean much, though. Most Integras I see are driven by 50yr-old women, too.

[denot]

LOL @ how CRZ thread has been off topic much (prob because there's nothing to say about the car itself). Anyway, if I have the money for CRZ, I will buy Veloster Turbo instead. At least it has a bit of power and room for my 2 yo and 6 months at the back. We cant even fit the 6 months at CRZ "backseat" when we do test drive last time (and he's only 4 months at that time). The child seat fit, but the legs of will be squeezed.

Funny thing is the salesman said to us "Oh, this car just not built for family with kids." So if I cant fit a 4 months to the back seat, who can you fit in there then? Why not remove the back seat altogether like the US and Jap version? Thats the stupidity of Honda OZ. They know their target is young family who still want a small sports car (ala S2000) but need rear seat for the baby.

Oh well, what can I say... I must be a dreamer to try to fit a 4months old into a back seat...

[Mikecivic78]

IMO, I don't mind the look of the Veloster. Them Koreans have come a long way in terms of design and fit & finish.

Perhaps with aftermarket sway bars and a decent set of lowering springs the veloster could be made to handle well. Its crappy dynamics are its Achilles heel.

[Tai]

Maybe he wasnt referring to the rear seats, maybe he is talking about comfort and boot space.

I can tell you taking a kid out of a 4 seat car is much more easier than a 2 door.

And did the salesman actually say the rear seats, or you just conjured this in your mind.

LOL @ how CRZ thread has been off topic much (prob because there's nothing to say about the car itself). Anyway, if I have the money for CRZ, I will buy Veloster Turbo instead. At least it has a bit of power and room for my 2 yo and 6 months at the back. We cant even fit the 6 months at CRZ "backseat" when we do test drive last time (and he's only 4 months at that time). The child seat fit, but the legs of will be squeezed.

Funny thing is the salesman said to us "Oh, this car just not built for family with kids." So if I cant fit a 4 months to the back seat, who can you fit in there then? Why not remove the back seat altogether like the US and Jap version? Thats the stupidity of Honda OZ. They know their target is young family who still want a small sports car (ala S2000) but need rear seat for the baby.

Oh well, what can I say... I must be a dreamer to try to fit a 4months old into a back seat...

[denot]

Maybe he wasnt referring to the rear seats, maybe he is talking about comfort and boot space.

I can tell you taking a kid out of a 4 seat car is much more easier than a 2 door.

And did the salesman actually say the rear seats, or you just conjured this in your mind.

well he said that the crz is not for family with kids after we try to fit the child seat (which fit ok) and my son (which cant fit)