k20A2 dyno figures

[xtercii]

Mugen N1 or J's 70RR and you will be laughing.

But then they arent street legal and you're too weaksauce Mikoz lol.

where can you get Mugen N1, don't you need racing licence or some shit to get them as they are not available to the public?

[Chi]

where can you get Mugen N1, don't you need racing licence or some shit to get them as they are not available to the public?

Not if you have connections.

IF you really want one I can get one

[2002 TeGgY]

k24 bottom end!

or toda 2.2 strocker kit more revs ftw

[Nepolian]

or toda 2.2 strocker kit more revs ftw

^^ So would love one! But for what its worth, You can build yourself a nice little race car!

[Chi]

or toda 2.2 strocker kit more revs ftw

So you're saying less displacement means the car can rev more?

[Nepolian]

or toda 2.2 strocker kit more revs ftw

So you're saying less displacement means the car can rev more?

I think what Tegy trying to say is that going K20/24 loses alot of the K20 rev properties/characteristics, where as the 2.2 can still rev out as it has a better bore x stroke ratio to the 2.4.

I know any motor can be built to rev but the Toda setup has been proven to work. You just have to pay $$.

Alternatively there heaps other options out there, just how you wanna do it!

[Chi]

I know any motor can be built to rev but the Toda setup has been proven to work. You just have to pay $$.

Do you have details of this proven set up that works?

IF you have money I'd rather go for the Tracy Sports 2.4 litre stroker set up which actually has been video recorded with track times and proving it can match up with higher revving k20a cars in a lighter chasis.

[Nepolian]

Do you have details of this proven set up that works?

IF you have money I'd rather go for the Tracy Sports 2.4 litre stroker set up which actually has been video recorded with track times and proving it can match up with higher revving k20a cars in a lighter chasis.

Chi,

Im not here to prove what is better than the other. Everyone has different views etc...etc....

There is a thousand way to skin a cat, so whether its a worked 2.0, 2.2 or 2.4 its up to the individual and application. I'm not here to get into a sh*tfight about what is better.

You and I both know that Toda Aust has built a few 2.2 strokers with good results. I'm sure any of the 2.4 combinations work, as proven buy a few people in the Honda circle.

End of the day if I had the money, I'd buy the new GTR and not try and work out how I will make the next kw from a Honda.

[Benson]

Why go to all that trouble and built a 2.2l? a 2.4l is capable of reving to 9000rpm...

If your were talking cost efficiency, 2.4l is the way to go..

[2002 TeGgY]

geez everyone is so dam sensitive on this site. I was just trying to say my opinion. On the k20/24 you would traditionally use the accord euro crank shaft which is known not to handle revs. While in the toda setup you would use an s2000 crank (i think) which is proven to handle the revs....

[45SET]

geez everyone is so dam sensitive on this site.

was thinking the same thing...

[7ypeR]

geez everyone is so dam sensitive on this site. I was just trying to say my opinion. On the k20/24 you would traditionally use the accord euro crank shaft which is known not to handle revs. While in the toda setup you would use an s2000 crank (i think) which is proven to handle the revs....

Me too